Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers: Trustworthy Conceptual Explanations for Vision Foundation Models
Hengyi Wang, Shiwei Tan, Hao Wang
Abstract
Vision transformers (ViTs) have emerged as a significant area of focus, particularly for their capacity to be jointly trained with large language models and to serve as robust vision foundation models. Yet, the development of trustworthy explanation methods for ViTs has lagged, particularly in the context of post-hoc interpretations of ViT predictions. Existing sub-image selection approaches, such as feature-attribution and conceptual models, fall short in this regard. This paper proposes five desiderata for explaining ViTs -- faithfulness, stability, sparsity, multi-level structure, and parsimony -- and demonstrates the inadequacy of current methods in meeting these criteria comprehensively. We introduce a variational Bayesian explanation framework, dubbed ProbAbilistic Concept Explainers (PACE), which models the distributions of patch embeddings to provide trustworthy post-hoc conceptual explanations. Our qualitative analysis reveals the distributions of patch-level concepts, elucidating the effectiveness of ViTs by modeling the joint distribution of patch embeddings and ViT's predictions. Moreover, these patch-level explanations bridge the gap between image-level and dataset-level explanations, thus completing the multi-level structure of PACE. Through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrate that PACE surpasses state-of-the-art methods in terms of the defined desiderata.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2e44e93c-aa4e-4896-be4d-b05781b790adCited by top-tier papers3
- Training-Free Bayesianization for Low-Rank Adapters of Large Language ModelsHaizhou Shi, Yibin Wang, Ligong Han, Huan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Interpreting vision transformers via residual replacement modelJinyeong Kim, Junhyeok Kim, Yumin Shim, Joohyeok Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Concept-Centric Token Interpretation for Vector-Quantized Generative ModelsTianze Yang, Yucheng Shi, Mengnan Du, Xuansheng Wu et al.ICML 2025
Builds on28
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
Related papers
- DAVE: Distribution-aware Attribution via ViT Gradient DecompositionAdam Wróbel, Siddhartha Gairola, Jacek Tabor, Bernt Schiele et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Inside the Visual Mind: Neuroscience-Motivated Concept Circuits for Interpreting and Steering Vision TransformersTang Li, Yanlin Chen, Mengmeng Ma, Xi PengICML 2026
- LeGrad: An Explainability Method for Vision Transformers via Feature Formation SensitivityWalid Bousselham, Angie W. Boggust, Sofian Chaybouti, Hendrik Strobelt et al.ICCV 2025 · 47 citations
- On the Faithfulness of Vision Transformer ExplanationsJunyi Wu, Weitai Kang, Hao Tang, Yuan Hong et al.CVPR 2024 · 8 citations
- Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationHyesu Lim, Jinho Choi, Jaegul Choo, Steffen SchneiderICLR 2025
