Do You Feel What I Hear? Enabling Autonomous IoT Device Pairing Using Different Sensor Types
Jun Han, Albert Jin Chung, Manal Kumar Sinha, Madhumitha Harishankar, Shijia Pan, Hae Young Noh, Pei Zhang, Patrick Tague
Abstract
Context-based pairing solutions increase the usability of IoT device pairing by eliminating any human involvement in the pairing process. This is possible by utilizing on-board sensors (with same sensing modalities) to capture a common physical context (e.g., ambient sound via each device's microphone). However, in a smart home scenario, it is impractical to assume that all devices will share a common sensing modality. For example, a motion detector is only equipped with an infrared sensor while Amazon Echo only has microphones. In this paper, we develop a new context-based pairing mechanism called Perceptio that uses time as the common factor across differing sensor types. By focusing on the event timing, rather than the specific event sensor data, Perceptio creates event fingerprints that can be matched across a variety of IoT devices. We propose Perceptio based on the idea that devices co-located within a physically secure boundary (e.g., single family house) can observe more events in common over time, as opposed to devices outside. Devices make use of the observed contextual information to provide entropy for Perceptio's pairing protocol. We design and implement Perceptio, and evaluate its effectiveness as an autonomous secure pairing solution. Our implementation demonstrates the ability to sufficiently distinguish between legitimate devices (placed within the boundary) and attacker devices (placed outside) by imposing a threshold on fingerprint similarity. Perceptio demonstrates an average fingerprint similarity of 94.9% between legitimate devices while even a hypothetical impossibly well-performing attacker yields only 68.9% between itself and a valid device.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- On the Safety of IoT Device Physical Interaction ControlWenbo Ding, Hongxin HuCCS 2018 · 169 citations
- HAWatcher: Semantics-Aware Anomaly Detection for Appified Smart HomesChenglong Fu, Qiang Zeng, Xiaojiang DuUSENIX Security 2021 · 109 citations
- IoTGaze: IoT Security Enforcement via Wireless Context AnalysisTianbo Gu, Zheng Fang, Allaukik Abhishek, Hao Fu et al.INFOCOM 2020 · 52 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- Harnessing the Ambient Radio Frequency Noise for Wearable Device PairingWenqiang Jin, Ming Li, Srinivasan Murali, Linke GuoCCS 2020 · 19 citations
Related papers
- One Key to Rule Them All: Secure Group Pairing for Heterogeneous IoT DevicesHabiba Farrukh, Muslum Ozgur Ozmen, Faik Kerem Örs, Z. Berkay CelikS&P 2023
- Enabling secure touch-to-access device pairing based on human body's electrical responseYao Wang, Tao Gu, Yu Zhang, Minjie Lyu et al.MobiCom 2022 · 5 citations
- T2Pair: Secure and Usable Pairing for Heterogeneous IoT DevicesXiaopeng Li, Qiang Zeng, Lannan Luo, Tongbo LuoCCS 2020 · 57 citations
- BeeKeeper: Securing Cross-Technology Communication via Channel-Aware Dual-BindingWeizheng Wang, Qipeng Xie, Mu Yuan, Qingqing Ye et al.INFOCOM 2026
- IoTSafe: Enforcing Safety and Security Policy with Real IoT Physical Interaction DiscoveryWenbo Ding, Hongxin Hu, Long ChengNDSS 2021
