The Three Praxes Framework - A Thematic Review and Map of Social Accessibility Research
JiWoong (Joon) Jang, Patrick Carrington, Andrew Begel
Abstract
Research in social accessibility aims to improve the lives of disabled people across diverse abilities and experiences by assisting with communication, relationships, and ecosystems of access. We seek to understand this intersectional body of work through analyzing social accessibility research from 2011 to 2025. Through constructivist grounded theory analysis of 90 papers (curated from 605), we develop the Three Praxes Framework: three sites of practice Artifact (constructive), Ecosystem (relational), and Epistemology (theoretical) - two cross-cutting stances toward change (Temporal Orientation and Stakeholder Focus) - and one reflexive cycle modeling how insights can flow between praxes. Our analysis reveals these praxes operate largely in isolation, risking that insights remain academic exercises while assistive technologies reinforce existing barriers. We call on the field to realize a cycle where disabled people's lived experiences shape material realities, material practice generates theoretical knowledge, and both transform ecosystems of access.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2e35e96e-1161-4862-8e26-ba2cbd0a6edbCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- What Do We Mean by "Accessibility Research"?: A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Dhruv Jain, Lucy Lu Wang et al.CHI 2021 · 323 citations
- "It's like With the Pregnancy Tests": Co-design of Speculative Technology for Public HIV-related Stigma and its Implications for Social MediaJuan F. Maestre, Daria V. Groves, Megan Furness, Patrick C. ShihCHI 2023 · 18 citations
- Designing for Relational Maintenance: New Directions for AAC ResearchJiamin Dai, Karyn Moffatt, Jinglan Lin, Khai N. TruongCHI 2022 · 18 citations
- "Ultimately, it's a matter of safety, and resisting ostracization": Understanding Neurodivergent Masking with Online CommunitiesKritika Kritika, Rua Mae Williams, Kathryn E. RinglandCHI 2025 · 15 citations
- "The World is Designed for Fluent People": Benefits and Challenges of Videoconferencing Technologies for People Who StutterShaomei WuCHI 2023 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Rethinking Interdependence in HCI: A Systematic Literature Review for Understanding its Use in Accessibility StudiesZeynep Yildiz, Kathrin GerlingCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- How Accessibility Practitioners Promote the Creation of Accessible Products in Large CompaniesShiri Azenkot, Margot J. Hanley, Catherine M. BakerCSCW 2021 · 24 citations
- A Critical Review of Sexuality, Technology and DisabilityDilisha Patel, Ekat Osipova, Katta Spiel, Giulia BarbareschiCHI 2025 · 12 citations
- #A11yDev: Understanding Contemporary Software Accessibility Practices from Twitter ConversationsSyed Fatiul Huq, Abdulaziz Alshayban, Ziyao He, Sam MalekCHI 2023 · 17 citations
- Urban Accessibility as a Socio-Political Problem: A Multi-Stakeholder AnalysisManaswi Saha, Devanshi Chauhan, Siddhant Patil, Rachel Kangas et al.CSCW 2020 · 39 citations
