AVIATE: Exploiting Translation Variants of Artifacts to Improve IR-based Traceability Recovery in Bilingual Software Projects
Kexin Sun, Yiding Ren, Hongyu Kuang, Hui Gao, Xiaoxing Ma, Guoping Rong, Dong Shao, He Zhang
Abstract
Traceability plays a vital role in facilitating various software development activities by establishing the traces between different types of artifacts (e.g., issues and commits in software repositories). Among the explorations for automated traceability recovery, the IR (Information Retrieval)-based approaches leverage textual similarity to measure the likelihood of traces between artifacts and show advantages in many scenarios. However, the globalization of software development has introduced new challenges, such as the possible multilingualism on the same concept (e.g., "[SEE PDF]" vs. "attribute") in the artifact texts, thus significantly hampering the performance of IR-based approaches. Existing research has shown that machine translation can help address the term inconsistency in bilingual projects. However, the translation can also bring in synonymous terms that are not consistent with those in the bilingual projects (e.g., another translation of "[SEE PDF]" as "property"). Therefore, we propose an enhancement strategy called AVIATE that exploits translation variants from different translators by utilizing the word pairs that appear simultaneously across the translation variants from different kinds artifacts (a.k.a. consensual biterms). We use these biterms to first enrich the artifact texts, and then to enhance the calculated IR values for improving IR-based trace-ability recovery for bilingual software projects. The experiments on 17 bilingual projects (involving English and 4 other languages) demonstrate that AVIATE significantly outperformed the IR-based approach with machine translation (the state-of-the-art in this field) with an average increase of 16.67 in Average Precision (31.43%) and 8.38 (11.22%) in Mean Average Precision, indicating its effectiveness in addressing the challenges of multilingual traceability recovery.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2daa1c5b-551d-4b9f-9a53-c42f45ac8608Builds on3
- Traceability Transformed: Generating more Accurate Links with Pre-Trained BERT ModelsJinfeng Lin, Yalin Liu, Qingkai Zeng, Meng Jiang et al.ICSE 2021 · 124 citations
- Using Consensual Biterms from Text Structures of Requirements and Code to Improve IR-Based Traceability RecoveryHui Gao, Hongyu Kuang, Kexin Sun, Xiaoxing Ma et al.ASE 2022 · 20 citations
- TRIAD: Automated Traceability Recovery based on Biterm-enhanced Deduction of Transitive Links among ArtifactsHui Gao, Hongyu Kuang, Wesley K. G. Assunção, Christoph Mayr-Dorn et al.ICSE 2024 · 8 citations
Related papers
- Automatic testing and improvement of machine translationZeyu Sun, Jie M. Zhang, Mark Harman, Mike Papadakis et al.ICSE 2020 · 111 citations
- Improving Word Sense Disambiguation with TranslationsYixing Luan, Bradley Hauer, Lili Mou, Grzegorz KondrakEMNLP 2020 · 19 citations
- Suggesting natural method names to check name consistenciesSon Nguyen, Hung Phan, Trinh Le, Tien N. NguyenICSE 2020 · 64 citations
- Semi-supervised pre-processing for learning-based traceability framework on real-world software projectsLiming Dong, He Zhang, Wei Liu, Zhiluo Weng et al.FSE 2022 · 15 citations
- ATRI: Mitigating Multilingual Audio Text Retrieval Inconsistencies by Reducing Data Distribution ErrorsYuguo Yin, Yuxin Xie, Wenyuan Yang, Dongchao Yang et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
