Fabrication-in-the-loop co-optimization of surfaces and styli for drawing haptics
Michal Piovarci, Danny M. Kaufman, David I. W. Levin, Piotr Didyk
Abstract
Digital drawing tools are now standard in art and design workflows. These tools offer comfort, portability, and precision as well as native integration with digital-art workflows, software, and tools. At the same time, artists continue to work with long-standing, traditional drawing tools. One feature of traditional tools, well-appreciated by many artists and lacking in digital tools, is the specific and diverse range of haptic responses provided by them. Haptic feedback in traditional drawing tools provides unique, per-tool responses that help determine the precision and character of individual strokes. In this work, we address the problem of fabricating digital drawing tools that closely match the haptic feedback of their traditional counterparts. This requires the formulation and solution of a complex, co-optimization of both digital styli and the drawing surfaces they move upon. Here, a potentially direct formulation of this optimization with numerical simulation-in-the-loop is not yet viable. As in many complex design tasks, state-of-the-art methods do not currently offer predictive modeling at rates and scales that can account for the numerous, coupled, physical behaviors governing the haptics of styli and surfaces, nor for the limitations and uncertainties inherent in their fabrication processes. To address these challenges, we propose fabrication-in-the-loop optimization. Critical to making this strategy practical we construct our objective via a Gaussian Process that does not require computing derivatives with respect to design parameters. Our Gaussian Process surrogate model then provides both function estimates and confidence intervals that guide the efficient sampling of our design space. In turn, this sampling critically reduces the numbers of fabricated examples during exploration and automatically handles exploration-exploitation trade-offs. We apply our method to fabricate drawing tools that provide a wide range of haptic feedback, and demonstrate that they are often hard for users to distinguish from their traditional drawing-tool analogs.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 2d9e09a5-7cf0-4191-a19d-e3d4251b3f85Cited by top-tier papers4
- Capturing Tactile Properties of Real Surfaces for Haptic ReproductionDonald Degraen, Michal Piovarci, Bernd Bickel, Antonio KrügerUIST 2021 · 22 citations
- Photographic Lighting Design with Photographer-in-the-Loop Bayesian OptimizationKenta Yamamoto, Yuki Koyama, Yoichi OchiaiUIST 2022 · 19 citations
- A Computational Approach to Magnetic Force Feedback DesignMasa Ogata, Yuki KoyamaCHI 2021 · 8 citations
- Relative Design Acquisition: A Computational Approach for Creating Visual Interfaces to Steer User ChoicesGeorge B. Mo, Per Ola KristenssonCHI 2023
Related papers
- Optimal Control for Electromagnetic Haptic Guidance SystemsThomas Langerak, Juan José Zarate, Velko Vechev, David Lindlbauer et al.UIST 2020 · 14 citations
- Investigating Positive and Negative Qualities of Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Designing Interaction TechniquesLiwei Chan, Yi-Chi Liao, George B. Mo, John J. Dudley et al.CHI 2022 · 94 citations
- BodyStylus: Freehand On-Body Design and Fabrication of Epidermal InterfacesNarjes Pourjafarian, Marion Koelle, Bruno Fruchard, Sahar Mavali et al.CHI 2021 · 34 citations
- Continual Human-in-the-Loop OptimizationYi-Chi Liao, Paul Streli, Zhipeng Li, Christoph Gebhardt et al.CHI 2025 · 11 citations
- Inkspire: Supporting Design Exploration with Generative AI through Analogical SketchingDavid Chuan-En Lin, Hyeonsu B. Kang, Nikolas Martelaro, Aniket Kittur et al.CHI 2025 · 56 citations
