Incorporating Item Frequency for Differentially Private Set Union
Ricardo Silva Carvalho, Ke Wang, Lovedeep Singh Gondara
Abstract
We study the problem of releasing the set union of users' items subject to differential privacy. Previous approaches consider only the set of items for each user as the input. We propose incorporating the item frequency, which is typically available in set union problems, to boost the utility of private mechanisms. However, using the global item frequency over all users would largely increase privacy loss. We propose to use the local item frequency of each user to approximate the global item frequency without incurring additional privacy loss. Local item frequency allows us to design greedy set union mechanisms that are differentially private, which is impossible for previous greedy proposals. Moreover, while all previous works have to use uniform sampling to limit the number of items each user would contribute to, our construction eliminates the sampling step completely and allows our mechanisms to consider all of the users' items. Finally, we propose to transfer the knowledge of the global item frequency from a public dataset into our mechanism, which further boosts utility even when the public and private datasets are from different domains. We evaluate the proposed methods on multiple real-life datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2d59d79c-77f0-4032-b48c-8cfe54436345Cited by top-tier papers5
- Sparsity-Preserving Differentially Private Training of Large Embedding ModelsBadih Ghazi, Yangsibo Huang, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Counting Distinct Elements Under Person-Level Differential PrivacyThomas Steinke, Alexander KnopNeurIPS 2023 · 4 citations
- Scalable Private Partition Selection via Adaptive WeightingJustin Y. Chen, Vincent Cohen-Addad, Alessandro Epasto, Morteza ZadimoghaddamICML 2025
- Private Set Union with Multiple ContributionsTravis Dick, Haim Kaplan, Alex Kulesza, Uri Stemmer et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Differentially Private Domain DiscoveryVinod Raman, Travis Dick, Matthew JosephICLR 2026
Builds on6
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Leveraging Public Data for Practical Private Query ReleaseTerrance Liu, Giuseppe Vietri, Thomas Steinke, Jonathan R. Ullman et al.ICML 2021 · 68 citations
- Private Query Release Assisted by Public DataRaef Bassily, Albert Cheu, Shay Moran, Aleksandar Nikolov et al.ICML 2020 · 53 citations
- Differentially Private Set UnionSivakanth Gopi, Pankaj Gulhane, Janardhan Kulkarni, Judy Hanwen Shen et al.ICML 2020 · 37 citations
Related papers
- Locally Differentially Private Frequent Itemset MiningTianhao Wang, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaS&P 2018 · 196 citations
- Providing Input-Discriminative Protection for Local Differential PrivacyXiaolan Gu, Ming Li, Li Xiong, Yang CaoICDE 2020 · 60 citations
- Multi-Class Item Mining Under Local Differential PrivacyYulian Mao, Qingqing Ye, Rong Du, Qi Wang et al.ICDE 2025 · 1 citation
- A General Framework for Per-record Differential PrivacyXinghe Chen, Dajun Sun, Quanqing Xu, Wei DongSIGMOD 2026
- PCKV: Locally Differentially Private Correlated Key-Value Data Collection with Optimized UtilityXiaolan Gu, Ming Li, Yueqiang Cheng, Li Xiong et al.USENIX Security 2020
