Computing Approximate 𝓁p Sensitivities
Swati Padmanabhan, David P. Woodruff, Richard Zhang
Abstract
Recent works in dimensionality reduction for regression tasks have introduced the notion of sensitivity, an estimate of the importance of a specific datapoint in a dataset, offering provable guarantees on the quality of the approximation after removing low-sensitivity datapoints via subsampling. However, fast algorithms for approximating sensitivities, which we show is equivalent to approximate regression, are known for only the setting, in which they are popularly termed leverage scores. In this work, we provide the first efficient algorithms for approximating sensitivities and other summary statistics of a given matrix. In particular, for a given matrix, we compute -approximation to its sensitivities at the cost of sensitivity computations. For estimating the total sensitivity (i.e. the sum of sensitivities), we provide an algorithm based on importance sampling of Lewis weights, which computes a constant factor approximation at the cost of roughly sensitivity computations, with no polynomial dependence on . Furthermore, we estimate the maximum sensitivity up to a factor in sensitivity computations. We also generalize these results to norms. Lastly, we experimentally show that for a wide class of structured matrices in real-world datasets, the total sensitivity can be quickly approximated and is significantly smaller than the theoretical prediction, demonstrating that real-world datasets have on average low intrinsic effective dimensionality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2d3cc2ff-e051-4cf1-ad4b-f7af16f9febaCited by top-tier papers3
- Optimal bounds for ℓp sensitivity sampling via ℓ2 augmentationAlexander Munteanu, Simon OmlorICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Improving the Bit Complexity of Communication for Distributed Convex OptimizationMehrdad Ghadiri, Yin Tat Lee, Swati Padmanabhan, William Swartworth et al.STOC 2024 · 1 citation
- LevAttention: Time, Space and Streaming Efficient Algorithm for Heavy AttentionsRavindran Kannan, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Praneeth Kacham, David P. WoodruffICLR 2025
Builds on18
- Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and not yet LearntSören Mindermann, Jan Markus Brauner, Muhammed Razzak, Mrinank Sharma et al.ICML 2022 · 237 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with General Value Function Approximation: Provably Efficient Approach via Bounded Eluder DimensionRuosong Wang, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Lin F. YangNeurIPS 2020 · 168 citations
- Provable Filter Pruning for Efficient Neural NetworksLucas Liebenwein, Cenk Baykal, Harry Lang, Dan Feldman et al.ICLR 2020 · 161 citations
- Coresets for Classification - Simplified and StrengthenedTung Mai, Cameron Musco, Anup RaoNeurIPS 2021 · 39 citations
- Pruning Neural Networks via Coresets and Convex Geometry: Towards No AssumptionsMurad Tukan, Loay Mualem, Alaa MaaloufNeurIPS 2022 · 29 citations
Related papers
- Sharper Bounds for ℓp Sensitivity SamplingDavid P. Woodruff, Taisuke YasudaICML 2023 · 8 citations
- Tight Sensitivity Bounds For Smaller CoresetsAlaa Maalouf, Adiel Statman, Dan FeldmanKDD 2020 · 11 citations
- Active Linear Regression for ℓp Norms and BeyondCameron Musco, Christopher Musco, David P. Woodruff, Taisuke YasudaFOCS 2022 · 4 citations
- Online Lewis Weight SamplingDavid P. Woodruff, Taisuke YasudaSODA 2023 · 3 citations
- Coresets for Near-Convex FunctionsMurad Tukan, Alaa Maalouf, Dan FeldmanNeurIPS 2020 · 49 citations
