Do Computer Vision Foundation Models Learn the Low-level Characteristics of the Human Visual System?
Yancheng Cai, Fei Yin, Dounia Hammou, Rafal Mantiuk
Abstract
Computer vision foundation models, such as DINO or OpenCLIP, are trained in a self-supervised manner on large image datasets. Analogously, substantial evidence suggests that the human visual system (HVS) is influenced by the statistical distribution of colors and patterns in the natural world, characteristics also present in the training data of foundation models. The question we address in this paper is whether foundation models trained on natural images mimic some of the low-level characteristics of the human visual system, such as contrast detection, contrast masking, and contrast constancy. Specifically, we designed a protocol comprising nine test types to evaluate the image encoders of 45 foundation and generative models. Our results indicate that some foundation models (e.g., DINO, DINOv2, and OpenCLIP), share some of the characteristics of human vision, but other models show little resemblance. Foundation models tend to show smaller sensitivity to low contrast and rather irregular responses to contrast across frequencies. The foundation models show the best agreement with human data in terms of contrast masking. Our findings suggest that human vision and computer vision may take both similar and different paths when learning to interpret images of the real world. Overall, while differences remain, foundation models trained on vision tasks start to align with low-level human vision, with DINOv2 showing the closest resemblance. Our code is available on https:// github.com/caiyancheng/VFM_HVS_CVPR2025 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2d10906c-4fe3-4ee9-a255-c480a32daa9dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
Related papers
- Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visionRobert Geirhos, Kantharaju Narayanappa, Benjamin Mitzkus, Tizian Thieringer et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 304 citations
- Probing and Bridging Geometry–Interaction Cues for Affordance Reasoning in Vision Foundation ModelsQing Zhang, Xuesong li, Jing ZhangCVPR 2026
- Prompt, Generate, Then Cache: Cascade of Foundation Models Makes Strong Few-Shot LearnersRenrui Zhang, Xiangfei Hu, Bohao Li, Siyuan Huang et al.CVPR 2023
- DINOv2 Meets Text: A Unified Framework for Image- and Pixel-Level Vision-Language AlignmentCijo Jose, Théo Moutakanni, Dahyun Kang, Federico Baldassarre et al.CVPR 2025
- Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMsShengbang Tong, Zhuang Liu, Yuexiang Zhai, Yi Ma et al.CVPR 2024 · 111 citations
