ACL Findings2026
Generating Effective CoT Traces for Mitigating Causal Hallucination
Yiheng Zhao, Jun Yan
Abstract
Although large language models (LLMs) excel in complex reasoning tasks, they suffer from severe causal hallucination in event causality identification (ECI), particularly in smaller models (1.5B parameters). A promising approach to address this issue is to fine-tune them with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces. However, there is currently a lack of CoT trace dataset available for ECI. In this paper, we first investigate the essential criteria that effective CoT traces should possess to mitigate causal hallucination in smaller models. We then design a pipeline to generate CoT traces that meet these criteria. Moreover, since there is currently no metric for quantifying causal hallucination, we also introduce a new metric, the Causal Hallucination Rate (CHR), to quantify causal hallucination, guide the formulation of effective CoT trace criteria, and validate the effectiveness of our pipeline. Our experiments show that fine-tuning with the CoT traces generated by our pipeline not only substantially reduces causal hallucination in smaller LLMs but also improves mean accuracy. Moreover, the fine-tuned models exhibit strong cross-dataset and cross-difficulty generalization, as well as robustness under misleading intervention prompts.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Builds on5
- Is ChatGPT a Good Causal Reasoner? A Comprehensive EvaluationJinglong Gao, Xiao Ding, Bing Qin, Ting LiuEMNLP Findings 2023 · 66 citations
- The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That FitDylan Zhang, Qirun Dai, Hao PengNeurIPS 2025 · 59 citations
- Small Models Struggle to Learn from Strong ReasonersYuetai Li, Xiang Yue, Zhangchen Xu, Fengqing Jiang et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 5 citations
- Instruction Data Selection via Answer DivergenceBo Li, Mingda Wang, Shikun Zhang, Wei YeACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Self-Distillation Bridges Distribution Gap in Language Model Fine-TuningZhaorui Yang, Tianyu Pang, Haozhe Feng, Han Wang et al.ACL 2024
Related papers
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Obscures Hallucination Cues in Large Language Models: An Empirical EvaluationJiahao Cheng, Tiancheng Su, Jia Yuan, Guoxiu He et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 11 citations
- Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Causal ReasoningYuangang Li, Yiqing Shen, Yi Nian, Jiechao Gao et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought ReasoningXiangning Yu, Zhuohan Wang, Linyi Yang, Haoxuan Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- DeCoT: Debiasing Chain-of-Thought for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks in Large Language Models via Causal InterventionJunda Wu, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen, Haoliang Wang et al.ACL 2024
- Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLMsZhen Xiong, Yujun Cai, Zhecheng Li, Yiwei WangEMNLP 2025
