Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

Improving Preference Alignment of LLM with Inference-Free Self-Refinement

Fukun Ma, Kaibin Tian, Jieting Xue, Xiaoyi Wang, Ye Ma, Quan Chen, Peng Jiang, Lijie Wen

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) develop the incontext learning capability through pretraining and instruction tuning, enabling task adaptation without parameter updates. Self-refinement is a manifestation of this capability, which allows LLMs to iteratively refine the output using selfgenerated feedback. However, empirical observations reveal Inference-Free Self-Refinement (IFSR) in preference alignment: LLMs generate preference-improved output via fixed instructions, requiring no specific feedback, even no initial responses. There are two key components of the IFSR in preference alignment. The refining instruction is a fixed instruction that constrains the output distribution from a preference-semantic perspective. During training, it facilitates joint learning of preferencerelated semantic representations and data distribution alignment. The pseudo reference response is constructed from paired preference data and serves as a demonstration to guide the output distribution. It mitigates off-policy distributional bias while enhancing token-level preference learning in training. Experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that incorporating IFSR into preference alignment yields performance improvement over 10%. Further ablation studies reveal additional characteristics and potential principles of IFSR.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on15

  1. Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
  2. Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
  3. Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
  4. Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
  5. Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations

Related papers

  1. CREAM: Consistency Regularized Self-Rewarding Language ModelsZhaoyang Wang, Weilei He, Zhiyuan Liang, Xuchao Zhang et al.ICLR 2025
  2. Self-Renewal Prompt Optimizing with Implicit ReasoningZihan Liang, Ben Chen, Zhuoran Ran, Zihan Wang et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 2 citations
  3. Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language ModelsSomanshu Singla, Zhen Wang, Tianyang Liu, Abdullah Ashfaq et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
  4. Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning for Aligning Reasoning in Language ModelsLeonardo Ranaldi, André FreitasEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
  5. WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And FeedbackTaiwei Shi, Zhuoer Wang, Longqi Yang, Ying-Chun Lin et al.ACL 2026 · 35 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines