Jumanji: The Case for Dynamic NUCA in the Datacenter
Brian C. Schwedock, Nathan Beckmann
Abstract
The datacenter introduces new challenges for computer systems around tail latency and security. This paper argues that dynamic NUCA techniques are a better solution to these challenges than prior cache designs. We show that dynamic NUCA designs can meet tail-latency deadlines with much less cache space than prior work, and that they also provide a natural defense against cache attacks. Unfortunately, prior dynamic NUCAs have missed these opportunities because they focus exclusively on reducing data movement.
We present Jumanji, a dynamic NUCA technique designed for tail latency and security. We show that prior last-level cache designs are vulnerable to new attacks and offer imperfect performance isolation. Jumanji solves these problems while significantly improving performance of co-running batch applications. Moreover, Jumanji only requires lightweight hardware and a few simple changes to system software, similar to prior D-NUCAs. At 20 cores, Jumanji improves batch weighted speedup by 14% on average, vs. just 2% for a non-NUCA design with weaker security, and is within 2% of an idealized design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Untangle: A Principled Framework to Design Low-Leakage, High-Performance Dynamic Partitioning SchemesZirui Neil Zhao, Adam Morrison, Christopher W. Fletcher, Josep TorrellasASPLOS 2023 · 7 citations
- Scatter and Split Securely: Defeating Cache Contention and Occupancy AttacksLukas Giner, Stefan Steinegger, Antoon Purnal, Maria Eichlseder et al.S&P 2023
Builds on5
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2019 · 2,435 citations
- Meltdown: Reading Kernel Memory from User SpaceMoritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Gruss, Thomas Prescher et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,456 citations
- SMoTherSpectre: Exploiting Speculative Execution through Port ContentionAtri Bhattacharyya, Alexandra Sandulescu, Matthias Neugschwandtner, Alessandro Sorniotti et al.CCS 2019 · 267 citations
- Port Contention for Fun and ProfitAlejandro Cabrera Aldaya, Billy Bob Brumley, Sohaib ul Hassan, Cesar Pereida García et al.S&P 2019 · 240 citations
- IRONHIDE: A Secure Multicore that Efficiently Mitigates Microarchitecture State Attacks for Interactive ApplicationsHamza Omar, Omer KhanHPCA 2020 · 24 citations
Related papers
- SCARF - A Low-Latency Block Cipher for Secure Cache-RandomizationFederico Canale, Tim Güneysu, Gregor Leander, Jan Philipp Thoma et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Native DRAM Cache: Re-architecting DRAM as a Large-Scale Cache for Data CentersYesin Ryu, Yoojin Kim, Giyong Jung, Jung Ho Ahn et al.ISCA 2024 · 5 citations
- Malicious Management Unit: Why Stopping Cache Attacks in Software is Harder Than You ThinkStephan van Schaik, Cristiano Giuffrida, Herbert Bos, Kaveh RazaviUSENIX Security 2018 · 64 citations
- SeqAss: Using SeqUential Associative Caches to Mitigate Conflict-Based Cache Attacks with Reduced Cache Misses and Performance OverheadWei Song, Zhidong Wang, Jinchi Han, Da Xie et al.S&P 2026
- TD-NUCA: Runtime Driven Management of NUCA Caches in Task Dataflow Programming ModelsPaul Caheny, Lluc Alvarez, Marc Casas, Miquel MoretóSC 2022 · 4 citations
