CRAB: Assessing the Strength of Causal Relationships Between Real-world Events
Angelika Romanou, Syrielle Montariol, Debjit Paul, Léo Laugier, Karl Aberer, Antoine Bosselut
Abstract
Understanding narratives requires reasoning about the cause-and-effect relationships between events mentioned in the text. While existing foundation models yield impressive results in many NLP tasks requiring reasoning, it is unclear whether they understand the complexity of the underlying network of causal relationships of events in narratives. In this work, we present CRAB, a new Causal Reasoning Assessment Benchmark designed to evaluate causal understanding of events in real-world narratives. CRAB contains fine-grained, contextual causality annotations for ∼ 2.7K pairs of real-world events that describe various newsworthy event timelines (e.g., the acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk). Using CRAB, we measure the performance of several large language models, demonstrating that most systems achieve poor performance on the task. Motivated by classical causal principles, we also analyze the causal structures of groups of events in CRAB, and find that models perform worse on causal reasoning when events are derived from complex causal structures compared to simple linear causal chains. We make our dataset and code available to the research community. 1 * Equal contribution 1 https://github.com/epfl-nlp/CRAB
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- Unveiling Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models: Reality or Mirage?Haoang Chi, He Li, Wenjing Yang, Feng Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
- COLD: Causal reasOning in cLosed Daily activitiesAbhinav Joshi, Areeb Ahmad, Ashutosh ModiNeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- Causal Discovery and Inference through Next-Token PredictionEivinas Butkus, Nikolaus KriegeskorteNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- METER: Evaluating Multi-Level Contextual Causal Reasoning in Large Language ModelsPengfeng Li, Chen Huang, Chaoqun Hao, Hongyao Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- CausalVLBench: Benchmarking Visual Causal Reasoning in Large Vision-Language ModelsAneesh Komanduri, Karuna Bhaila, Xintao WuEMNLP 2025
Builds on8
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction TuningShayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson et al.ICML 2023 · 908 citations
Related papers
- Can Large Language Models Infer Causal Relationships from Real-World Text?Ryan Saklad, Aman Chadha, Oleg V. Pavlov, Raha MoraffahACL 2026 · 4 citations
- LLMs Struggle to Balance Reasoning and World Knowledge in Causal Narrative UnderstandingKhurram Yamin, Shantanu Gupta, Gaurav R. Ghosal, Zachary C. Lipton et al.ICLR 2026
- e-CARE: a New Dataset for Exploring Explainable Causal ReasoningLi Du, Xiao Ding, Kai Xiong, Ting Liu et al.ACL 2022
- Temporal reasoning for timeline summarisation in social mediaJiayu Song, Mahmud Elahi Akhter, Dana Atzil-Slonim, Maria LiakataACL 2025 · 6 citations
- NoisyCausal: A Benchmark for Evaluating Causal Reasoning Under Structured NoiseZhi Xu, Yun FuACL 2026
