FRIEDA: Benchmarking Multi-Step Cartographic Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Jiyoon Pyo, Yuankun Jiao, Dongwon Jung, Zekun Li, Leeje Jang, Sofia Kirsanova, Jina Kim, Yijun Lin, Qin Liu, Junyi Xie, Hadi Askari, Nan Xu
Abstract
Cartographic reasoning is the skill of interpreting geographic relationships by aligning legends, map scales, compass directions, map texts, and geometries across one or more map images. Although essential as a concrete cognitive capability and for critical tasks such as disaster response and urban planning, it remains largely unevaluated. Building on progress in chart and infographic understanding, recent large vision language model (LVLM) works on map visual question-answering (VQA) often simplify maps as a special case of charts. In contrast, map VQA demands comprehension of layered symbology (e.g., symbols, geometries, and text labels) as well as spatial relations tied to orientation and distance that often span multiple maps and are not captured by chart-style evaluations. To address this gap, we introduce FRIEDA, a benchmark for testing complex open-ended cartographic reasoning in LVLMs. FRIEDA sources real map images from documents and reports in various domains (e.g., geology, urban planning, and environmental assessment) and geographical areas. Following classifications in Geographic Information System (GIS) literature, FRIEDA targets all three categories of spatial relations: topological (border, equal, intersect, within), metric (distance), and directional (orientation). All questions require multi-step inference, and many require cross-map grounding and reasoning. We evaluate eleven state-of-the-art LVLMs under two settings: (1) the direct setting, where we provide the maps relevant to the question, and (2) the contextual setting, where the model may have to identify the maps relevant to the question before reasoning. Even the strongest models, Gemini-2.5-Pro and GPT-5-Think, achieve only 38.20% and 37.20% accuracy, respectively, far below human performance of 84.87%. These results reveal a persistent gap in multi-step cartographic reasoning, positioning FRIEDA as a rigorous benchmark to drive progress on spatial intelligence in LVLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on11
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own GenerationsArjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi FengNeurIPS 2024 · 865 citations
- SpatialRGPT: Grounded Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsAn-Chieh Cheng, Hongxu Yin, Yang Fu, Qiushan Guo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 412 citations
- SlideVQA: A Dataset for Document Visual Question Answering on Multiple ImagesRyota Tanaka, Kyosuke Nishida, Kosuke Nishida, Taku Hasegawa et al.AAAI 2023 · 178 citations
- An Empirical Analysis on Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Large Multimodal ModelsFatemeh Shiri, Xiao-Yu Guo, Mona Far, Xin Yu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
- Intern VL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic TasksZhe Chen, Jiannan Wu, Wenhai Wang, Weijie Su et al.CVPR 2024
Related papers
- MMSI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Image Spatial IntelligenceSihan Yang, Runsen Xu, Yiman Xie, Sizhe Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 195 citations
- Spatial Reasoning with Vision-Language Models in Ego-Centric Multi-View ScenesMohsen Gholami, Ahmad Rezaei, Zhou Weimin, Sitong Mao et al.ICLR 2026 · 67 citations
- HiSpatial: Taming Hierarchical 3D Spatial Understanding in Vision-Language ModelsHuizhi Liang, Yichao Shen, Yu Deng, Sicheng Xu et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- GTR-Bench: Evaluating Geo-Temporal Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsQinghongbing Xie, Zhaoyuan Xia, Feng Zhu, Lijun Gong et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Med-CMR: A Fine-Grained Benchmark Integrating Visual Evidence and Clinical Logic for Medical Complex Multimodal ReasoningHaozhen Gong, Xiaozhong Ji, Yuansen Liu, Wenbin Wu et al.CVPR 2026 · 15 citations
