Probing Visual Language Priors in VLMs
Tiange Luo, Ang Cao, Gunhee Lee, Justin Johnson, Honglak Lee
Abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) may over-rely on visual language priors from their training data rather than true visual reasoning. To investigate this, we introduce ViLP, a benchmark featuring deliberately out-of-distribution images synthesized via image generation models and out-ofdistribution Q&A pairs. Each question in ViLP is coupled with three potential answers and three corresponding images: one that can be resolved by text priors alone and two that demand visual reasoning. Although humans achieve near-perfect accuracy, modern VLMs falter; for instance, GPT-4o achieves only 66.17% on ViLP. To alleviate this, we propose a self-improving framework in which models generate new VQA data and then apply pixel-level and semantic corruptions to form "good-bad" image pairs for self-training. Our proposed training objective, Image-DPO, compels VLMs to focus more on the actual visual inputs, and we demonstrate its effectiveness in LLaVA-v1.5 and Cambrian. Project
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Vision Language Models are BiasedAn Vo, Khai-Nguyen Nguyen, Mohammad Reza Taesiri, Thi Tuong Vy Dang et al.ICLR 2026 · 68 citations
- Understanding Language Prior of LVLMs by Contrasting Chain-of-EmbeddingLin Long, Changdae Oh, Seongheon Park, Sharon LiICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- MergeMix: A Unified Augmentation Paradigm for Visual and Multi-Modal UnderstandingXin Jin, Siyuan Li, Siyong Jian, Kai Yu et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Symmetrical Visual Contrastive Optimization: Aligning Vision-Language Models with Minimal Contrastive ImagesShengguang Wu, Fan-Yun Sun, Kaiyue Wen, Nick HaberACL 2025 · 12 citations
- Scaling Test-Time Robustness of Vision-Language Models via Self-Critical Inference FrameworkKaihua Tang, Jiaxin Qi, Jinli Ou, Yuhua Zheng et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on33
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
Related papers
- Hallusionbench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language ModelsTianrui Guan, Fuxiao Liu, Xiyang Wu, Ruiqi Xian et al.CVPR 2024
- Are VLMs Ready for Autonomous Driving? An Empirical Study from the Reliability, Data, and Metric PerspectivesShaoyuan Xie, Lingdong Kong, Yuhao Dong, Chonghao Sima et al.ICCV 2025 · 25 citations
- Why are Visually-Grounded Language Models Bad at Image Classification?Yuhui Zhang, Alyssa Unell, Xiaohan Wang, Dhruba Ghosh et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 128 citations
- DynaMath: A Dynamic Visual Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Robustness of Vision Language ModelsChengke Zou, Xingang Guo, Rui Yang, Junyu Zhang et al.ICLR 2025
- Is Your (Reasoning) Multimodal Language Model Vulnerable Toward Distractions?Ming Liu, Hao Chen, Jindong Wang, Liwen Wang et al.AAAI 2026
