ACL Findings2025
Rethinking Table Instruction Tuning
Naihao Deng, Rada Mihalcea
Abstract
Recent advances in table understanding have focused on instruction-tuning large language models (LLMs) for table-related tasks. However, existing research has overlooked the impact of hyperparameter choices, and also lacks a comprehensive evaluation of the outof-domain table understanding ability and the general capabilities of these table LLMs. In this paper, we evaluate these abilities in existing table LLMs, and find significant declines in both out-of-domain table understanding and general capabilities as compared to their base models. Through systematic analysis, we show that hyperparameters, such as learning rate, can significantly influence both table-specific and general capabilities. Contrary to the previous table instruction-tuning work, we demonstrate that smaller learning rates and fewer training instances can enhance table understanding while preserving general capabilities. Based on our findings, we introduce TAMA, a TAble LLM instruction-tuned from LLaMA 3.1 8B Instruct, which achieves performance on par with, or surpassing GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on table tasks, while maintaining strong out-of-domain generalization and general capabilities. Our findings highlight the potential for reduced data annotation costs and more efficient model development through careful hyperparameter selection. We open-source the project and our models. 1
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 3 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- NeedleInATable: Exploring Long-Context Capability of Large Language Models towards Long-Structured TablesLanrui Wang, Mingyu Zheng, Hongyin Tang, Zheng Lin et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and EvaluationWei Zhou, Bolei Ma, Annemarie Friedrich, Mohsen MesgarACL 2026 · 3 citations
- RoT: Enhancing Table Reasoning with Iterative Row-Wise TraversalsXuanliang Zhang, Dingzirui Wang, Keyan Xu, Qingfu Zhu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on20
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive CritiquingZhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen et al.ICLR 2024 · 699 citations
Related papers
- AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMsAohan Zeng, Mingdao Liu, Rui Lu, Bowen Wang et al.ACL Findings 2024 · 40 citations
- TableDreamer: Progressive and Weakness-guided Data Synthesis from Scratch for Table Instruction TuningMingyu Zheng, Zhifan Feng, Jia Wang, Lanrui Wang et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 1 citation
- Unveiling the Secret Recipe: A Guide For Supervised Fine-Tuning Small LLMsAldo Pareja, Nikhil Shivakumar Nayak, Hao Wang, Krishnateja Killamsetty et al.ICLR 2025
- Table-LLM-Specialist: Language Model Specialists for Tables using Iterative Fine-tuningJunjie Xing, Yeye He, Mengyu Zhou, Haoyu Dong et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Table-GPT: Table Fine-tuned GPT for Diverse Table TasksPeng Li, Yeye He, Dror Yashar, Weiwei Cui et al.SIGMOD 2024 · 63 citations
