Soft Augmentation for Image Classification
Yang Liu, Shen Yan, Laura Leal-Taixé, James Hays, Deva Ramanan
Abstract
Modern neural networks are over-parameterized and thus rely on strong regularization such as data augmentation and weight decay to reduce overfitting and improve generalization. The dominant form of data augmentation applies invariant transforms, where the learning target of a sample is invariant to the transform applied to that sample. We draw inspiration from human visual classification studies and propose generalizing augmentation with invariant transforms to soft augmentation where the learning target softens non-linearly as a function of the degree of the transform applied to the sample: e.g., more aggressive image crop augmentations produce less confident learning targets. We demonstrate that soft targets allow for more aggressive data augmentation, offer more robust performance boosts, work with other augmentation policies, and interestingly, produce better calibrated models (since they are trained to be less confident on aggressively cropped/occluded examples). Combined with existing aggressive augmentation strategies, soft targets 1) double the top-1 accuracy boost across Cifar-10, Cifar-100, ImageNet-1K, and ImageNet-V2, 2) improve model occlusion performance by up to 4×, and 3) half the expected calibration error (ECE). Finally, we show that soft augmentation generalizes to self-supervised classification tasks. Code available at https://github.com/youngleox/soft_ augmentation
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 29fadba4-8efc-4ed9-989e-1206bddcefe3Cited by top-tier papers3
- Fourier-Basis Functions to Bridge Augmentation Gap: Rethinking Frequency Augmentation in Image ClassificationPuru Vaish, Shunxin Wang, Nicola StrisciuglioCVPR 2024 · 11 citations
- SAFLEX: Self-Adaptive Augmentation via Feature Label ExtrapolationMucong Ding, Bang An, Yuancheng Xu, Anirudh Satheesh et al.ICLR 2024 · 1 citation
- Are Data Augmentation Methods in Named Entity Recognition Applicable for Uncertainty Estimation?Wataru Hashimoto, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro WatanabeEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on17
- CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers With Localizable FeaturesSangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Seong Joon Oh et al.ICCV 2019 · 5,843 citations
- RandAugment: Practical Automated Data Augmentation with a Reduced Search SpaceEkin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Jonathon Shlens, Quoc LeNeurIPS 2020 · 4,453 citations
- Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy ReductionJure Zbontar, Li Jing, Ishan Misra, Yann LeCun et al.ICML 2021 · 2,942 citations
- Energy-based Out-of-distribution DetectionWeitang Liu, Xiaoyun Wang, John D. Owens, Yixuan LiNeurIPS 2020 · 2,213 citations
- Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object DetectionXiang Li, Wenhai Wang, Lijun Wu, Shuo Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,118 citations
Related papers
- Soft Equivariance Regularization for Invariant Self-Supervised LearningJoohyung Lee, Changhun Kim, Hyunsu Kim, Kwanhyung Lee et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- A Regularization-Guided Equivariant Approach for Image RestorationYulu Bai, Jiahong Fu, Qi Xie, Deyu MengCVPR 2025
- TeachAugment: Data Augmentation Optimization Using Teacher KnowledgeTeppei SuzukiCVPR 2022 · 57 citations
- Combining Ensembles and Data Augmentation Can Harm Your CalibrationYeming Wen, Ghassen Jerfel, Rafael Muller, Michael W. Dusenberry et al.ICLR 2021 · 72 citations
- Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust GeneralizationSaehyung Lee, Hyungyu Lee, Sungroh YoonCVPR 2020
