Correcting Knowledge Base Assertions
Jiaoyan Chen, Xi Chen, Ian Horrocks, Erik B. Myklebust, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
2020Year
23Citations
1Top-tier citations
Abstract
The usefulness and usability of knowledge bases (KBs) is often limited by quality issues. One common issue is the presence of erroneous assertions, often caused by lexical or semantic confusion. We study the problem of correcting such assertions, and present a general correction framework which combines lexical matching, semantic embedding, soft constraint mining and semantic consistency checking. The framework is evaluated using DBpedia and an enterprise medical KB.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- Joint Open Knowledge Base Canonicalization and LinkingYinan Liu, Wei Shen, Yuanfei Wang, Jianyong Wang et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 16 citations
- Generating Explanations to Understand and Repair Embedding-Based Entity AlignmentXiaobin Tian, Zequn Sun, Wei HuICDE 2024 · 6 citations
- Knowledge-aware Named Entity Recognition with Alleviating HeterogeneityBinling Nie, Ruixue Ding, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang et al.AAAI 2021 · 12 citations
- NeuSymEA: Neuro-symbolic Entity Alignment via Variational InferenceShengyuan Chen, Zheng Yuan, Qinggang Zhang, Wen Hua et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- VerifiNER: Verification-augmented NER via Knowledge-grounded Reasoning with Large Language ModelsSeoyeon Kim, Kwangwook Seo, Hyungjoo Chae, Jinyoung Yeo et al.ACL 2024 · 7 citations
