Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probes
Alex McKenzie, Urja Pawar, Phil Blandfort, William Bankes, David Krueger, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Dmitrii Krasheninnikov
Abstract
Monitoring is an important aspect of safely deploying Large Language Models (LLMs). This paper examines activation probes for detecting ``high-stakes''interactions -- where the text indicates that the interaction might lead to significant harm -- as a critical, yet underexplored, target for such monitoring. We evaluate several probe architectures trained on synthetic data, and find them to exhibit robust generalization to diverse, out-of-distribution, real-world data. Probes'performance is comparable to that of prompted or finetuned medium-sized LLM monitors, while offering computational savings of six orders-of-magnitude. These savings are enabled by reusing activations of the model that is being monitored. Our experiments also highlight the potential of building resource-aware hierarchical monitoring systems, where probes serve as an efficient initial filter and flag cases for more expensive downstream analysis. We release our novel synthetic dataset and the codebase at https://github.com/arrrlex/models-under-pressure.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 29d1ac06-3b8e-475b-81a3-23ed8179d134Cited by top-tier papers6
- Constitutional Classifiers++: Efficient Production-Grade Defenses against Universal JailbreaksHoagy Cunningham, Jerry Wei, Zihan Wang, Andrew Persic et al.ICLR 2026 · 39 citations
- Reasoning Theater: Disentangling Model Beliefs from Chain-of-ThoughtSiddharth Boppana, Annabel Ma, Max Loeffler, Raphaël Sarfati et al.ICML 2026 · 30 citations
- Beyond Linear Probes: Dynamic Safety Monitoring for Language ModelsJames Oldfield, Philip Torr, Ioannis Patras, Adel Bibi et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- Strategic Dishonesty Can Undermine AI Safety Evaluations of Frontier LLMsAlexander Panfilov, Evgenii Kortukov, Kristina Nikolic, Matthias Bethge et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Diffusion Probe: Generated Image Result Prediction Using CNN ProbesBukun Huang, Benlei Cui, Zhizeng Ye, Xuemei Dong et al.CVPR 2026 · 13 citations
Builds on17
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query RoutingDujian Ding, Ankur Mallick, Chi Wang, Robert Sim et al.ICLR 2024 · 282 citations
- Red Teaming Language Models with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Saffron Huang, H. Francis Song, Trevor Cai et al.EMNLP 2022 · 239 citations
- A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, James Wilken-Smith, Tomás Dulka, Hardik Bhatnagar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 168 citations
- Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via SteganographySumeet Ramesh Motwani, Mikhail Baranchuk, Martin Strohmeier, Vijay Bolina et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 140 citations
Related papers
- Detecting Strategic Deception with Linear ProbesNicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Bilal Chughtai, Stefan Heimersheim, Marius HobbhahnICML 2025
- Beyond Token Probes: Hallucination Detection via Activation Tensors with ACT-ViTGuy Bar-Shalom, Fabrizio Frasca, Yaniv Galron, Yftah Ziser et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- Toxicity Detection for FreeZhanhao Hu, Julien Piet, Geng Zhao, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
- LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural LanguageAlexander Pan, Lijie Chen, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2026 · 31 citations
- Probing Language Models for Pre-training Data DetectionZhenhua Liu, Tong Zhu, Chuanyuan Tan, Bing Liu et al.ACL 2024 · 4 citations
