Textual Self-Attention Network: Test-Time Preference Optimization Through Textual Gradient-Based Attention
Shibing Mo, Haoyang Ruan, Kai Wu, Jing Liu
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable generalization capabilities, but aligning their outputs with human preferences typically requires expensive supervised fine-tuning. Recent test-time methods leverage textual feedback to overcome this, but they often critique and revise a single candidate response, lacking a principled mechanism to systematically analyze, weigh, and synthesize the strengths of multiple promising candidates. Such a mechanism is crucial because different responses may excel in distinct aspects (e.g., clarity, factual accuracy, or tone), and combining their best elements may produce a far superior outcome. This paper proposes the Textual Self-Attention Network (TSAN), a new paradigm for test-time preference optimization that requires no parameter updates. TSAN emulates self-attention entirely in natural language to overcome this gap: it analyzes multiple candidates by formatting them into textual keys and values, weighs their relevance using an LLM-based attention module, and synthesizes their strengths into a new, preference-aligned response under the guidance of the learned textual attention. This entire process operates in a textual gradient space, enabling iterative and interpretable optimization. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that with just three test-time iterations on a base SFT model, TSAN outperforms supervised models like Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and surpasses the current state-of-the-art test-time alignment method by effectively leveraging multiple candidate solutions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on8
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine TranslationHaoran Xu, Amr Sharaf, Yunmo Chen, Weiting Tan et al.ICML 2024 · 447 citations
- Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMsXuan Zhang, Chao Du, Tianyu Pang, Qian Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 177 citations
Related papers
- Test-Time Preference Optimization: On-the-Fly Alignment via Iterative Textual FeedbackYafu Li, Xuyang Hu, Xiaoye Qu, Linjie Li et al.ICML 2025
- REAR: Test-time Preference Realignment through Reward DecompositionFuxiang Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Chenran Li, Yi-Chen Li et al.ICML 2026
- GenARM: Reward Guided Generation with Autoregressive Reward Model for Test-Time AlignmentYuancheng Xu, Udari Madhushani Sehwag, Alec Koppel, Sicheng Zhu et al.ICLR 2025
- LLMdoctor: Token-Level Flow-Guided Preference Optimization for Efficient Test-Time Alignment of Large Language ModelsTiesunlong Shen, Rui Mao, Jin Wang, Heming Sun et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- T-POP: Test-Time Personalization with Online Preference FeedbackZikun Qu, Min Zhang, Mingze Kong, Xiang Li et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
