When Do Drivers Interact with In-Vehicle Well-being Interventions?: An Exploratory Analysis of a Longitudinal Study on Public Roads
Kevin Koch, Varun Mishra, Shu Liu, Thomas Berger, Elgar Fleisch, David Kotz, Felix Wortmann
Abstract
Recent developments of novel in-vehicle interventions show the potential to transform the otherwise routine and mundane task of commuting into opportunities to improve the drivers' health and well-being. Prior research has explored the effectiveness of various in-vehicle interventions and has identified moments in which drivers could be interruptible to interventions. All the previous studies, however, were conducted in either simulated or constrained real-world driving scenarios on a pre-determined route. In this paper, we take a step forward and evaluate when drivers interact with in-vehicle interventions in unconstrained free-living conditions.
To this end, we conducted a two-month longitudinal study with 10 participants, in which each participant was provided with a study car for their daily driving needs. We delivered two in-vehicle interventions ś each aimed at improving affective well-being ś and simultaneously recorded the participants' driving behavior. In our analysis, we found that several pre-trip characteristics (like trip length, traffic flow, and vehicle occupancy) and the pre-trip affective state of the participants had significant associations with whether the participants started an intervention or canceled a started intervention. Next, we found that several in-the-moment driving characteristics (like current road type, past average speed, and future brake behavior) showed significant associations with drivers' responsiveness to the intervention. Further, we identified several driving behaviors that łnegatedž the effectiveness of interventions and highlight the potential of using such łnegativež driving characteristics to better inform intervention delivery. Finally, we compared trips with and without intervention and found that both interventions employed in our study did not have a negative effect on driving behavior. Based on our analyses, we provide solid recommendations on how to deliver interventions to maximize responsiveness and effectiveness and minimize the burden on the drivers. CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; Ubiquitous and mobile computing systems and tools; • Applied computing → Consumer health.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2980c327-2f12-43b1-9976-aedd76bf4103Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Breeze: Smartphone-based Acoustic Real-time Detection of Breathing Phases for a Gamified Biofeedback Breathing TrainingChen-Hsuan Iris Shih, Naofumi Tomita, Yanick X. Lukic, Álvaro Hernández Reguera et al.UbiComp 2020 · 110 citations
- Exploring the State-of-Receptivity for mHealth InterventionsFlorian Künzler, Varun Mishra, Jan-Niklas Kramer, David Kotz et al.UbiComp 2020 · 91 citations
- Evaluating the Reproducibility of Physiological Stress Detection ModelsVarun Mishra, Sougata Sen, Grace Chen, Tian Hao et al.UbiComp 2021 · 79 citations
- CARoma Therapy: Pleasant Scents Promote Safer Driving, Better Mood, and Improved Well-Being in Angry DriversDmitrijs Dmitrenko, Emanuela Maggioni, Giada Brianza, Brittany E. Holthausen et al.CHI 2020 · 67 citations
- Calm Commute: Guided Slow Breathing for Daily Stress Management in DriversStephanie Balters, Matthew Louis Mauriello, So Yeon Park, James A. Landay et al.UbiComp 2020 · 61 citations
Related papers
- Taking Mental Health & Well-Being to the Streets: An Exploratory Evaluation of In-Vehicle Interventions in the WildKevin Koch, Verena Tiefenbeck, Shu Liu, Thomas Berger et al.CHI 2021 · 18 citations
- The Effect of In-Car Agent Embodiment on Different Types of Information DeliveryBonhee Ku, Chang-Min Kim, Hyungjun Cho, Jisu Park et al.CHI 2025 · 3 citations
- Interruptibility for In-vehicle Multitasking: Influence of Voice Task Demands and Adaptive BehaviorsAuk Kim, Jung-Mi Park, Uichin LeeUbiComp 2020 · 30 citations
- A Design Space for Human Sensor and Actuator Focused In-Vehicle Interaction Based on a Systematic Literature ReviewPascal Jansen, Mark Colley, Enrico RukzioUbiComp 2022 · 44 citations
- ProVoice: Designing Proactive Functionality for In-Vehicle Conversational Assistants using Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization to Enhance Driver ExperienceJosh Susak, Yifu Liu, Pascal Jansen, Mark ColleyCHI 2026 · 2 citations
