Strong Model Collapse
Elvis Dohmatob, Yunzhen Feng, Arjun Subramonian, Julia Kempe
Abstract
Within the scaling laws paradigm, which underpins the training of large neural networks like ChatGPT and Llama, we consider a supervised regression setting and establish the existance of a strong form of the model collapse phenomenon, a critical performance degradation due to synthetic data in the training corpus. Our results show that even the smallest fraction of synthetic data (e.g., as little as 1% of the total training dataset) can still lead to model collapse: larger and larger training sets do not enhance performance. We further investigate whether increasing model size, an approach aligned with current trends in training large language models, exacerbates or mitigates model collapse. In a simplified regime where neural networks are approximated via random projections of tunable size, we both theoretically and empirically show that larger models can amplify model collapse. Interestingly, our theory also indicates that, beyond the interpolation threshold (which can be extremely high for very large datasets), larger models may mitigate the collapse, although they do not entirely prevent it. Our theoretical findings are empirically verified through experiments on language models and feed-forward neural networks for images.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2965c189-e573-425b-8dce-973c6ca6f6e2Cited by top-tier papers30
- R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero DataChengsong Huang, Wenhao Yu, Xiaoyang Wang, Hongming Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 220 citations
- Tool Learning in the Wild: Empowering Language Models as Automatic Tool AgentsZhengliang Shi, Shen Gao, Lingyong Yan, Yue Feng et al.WWW 2025 · 59 citations
- The Best Instruction-Tuning Data are Those That FitDylan Zhang, Qirun Dai, Hao PengNeurIPS 2025 · 59 citations
- Pre-training under infinite computeKonwoo Kim, Suhas Kotha, Percy Liang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2026 · 25 citations
- A Closer Look at Model Collapse: From a Generalization-to-Memorization PerspectiveLianghe Shi, Meng Wu, Huijie Zhang, Zekai Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
Builds on10
- Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADSina Alemohammad, Josue Casco-Rodriguez, Lorenzo Luzi, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun et al.ICLR 2024 · 279 citations
- The Neural Tangent Kernel in High Dimensions: Triple Descent and a Multi-Scale Theory of GeneralizationBen Adlam, Jeffrey PenningtonICML 2020 · 133 citations
- A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling LawsElvis Dohmatob, Yunzhen Feng, Pu Yang, François Charton et al.ICML 2024 · 123 citations
- Generalization Error Rates in Kernel Regression: The Crossover from the Noiseless to Noisy RegimeHugo Cui, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala, Lenka ZdeborováNeurIPS 2021 · 109 citations
- Model Collapse Demystified: The Case of RegressionElvis Dohmatob, Yunzhen Feng, Julia KempeNeurIPS 2024 · 96 citations
Related papers
- Demystifying Synthetic Data in LLM Pre-training: A Systematic Study of Scaling Laws, Benefits, and PitfallsFeiyang Kang, Newsha Ardalani, Michael Kuchnik, Youssef Emad et al.EMNLP 2025
- Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires VerificationYunzhen Feng, Elvis Dohmatob, Pu Yang, François Charton et al.ICLR 2025 · 6 citations
- How to inject knowledge efficiently? Knowledge Infusion Scaling Law for Pre-training Large Language ModelsKangtao Lv, Haibin Chen, Yujin Yuan, Langming Liu et al.EMNLP 2025
- Scaling Laws of Synthetic Images for Model Training ... for NowLijie Fan, Kaifeng Chen, Dilip Krishnan, Dina Katabi et al.CVPR 2024
- Escaping Collapse: The Strength of Weak Data for Large Language Model TrainingKareem Amin, Sara Babakniya, Alex Bie, Weiwei Kong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
