Magic Shapes for SHACL Validation
Shqiponja Ahmetaj, Bianca Löhnert, Magdalena Ortiz, Mantas Simkus
Abstract
A key prerequisite for the successful adoption of the Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)---the W3C standardized constraint language for RDF graphs---is the availability of automated tools that efficiently validate targeted constraints (known as shapes graphs ) over possibly very large RDF graphs. There are already significant efforts to produce optimized engines for SHACL validation, but they focus on restricted fragments of SHACL. For unrestricted SHACL, that is SHACL with unrestricted recursion and negation, there is no validator beyond a proof-of-concept prototype, and existing techniques are inherently incompatible with the goal-driven approaches being pursued by existing validators. Instead they require a global computation on the entire data graph that is not only computationally very costly, but also brittle, and can easily result in validation failures due to conflicts that are irrelevant to the validation targets.
To address these challenges, we present a 'magic' transformation---based on Magic Sets as known from Logic Programming---that transforms a SHACL shapes graph S into a new shapes graph S' whose validation considers only the relevant neighbourhood of the targeted nodes. The new S' is equivalent to S whenever there are no conflicts between the constraints and the data, and in case the validation of S fails due to conflicts that are irrelevant to the target, S' may still admit a lazy, target-oriented validation. We implement the algorithm and run preliminary experiments, showing our approach can be a stepping stone towards validators for full SHACL, and that it can significantly improve the performance of the only prototype validator that currently supports full recursion and negation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 294b77a4-e424-4fd6-8ac3-6eeda394c1b3Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on2
Related papers
- Efficient Validation of SHACL Shapes with ReasoningJin Ke, Zenon G. Zacouris, Maribel AcostaVLDB 2024 · 9 citations
- From Shapes to Shapes: Inferring SHACL Shapes for Results of SPARQL CONSTRUCT QueriesPhilipp Seifer, Daniel Hernández, Ralf Lämmel, Steffen StaabWWW 2024 · 3 citations
- Transforming RDF Graphs to Property Graphs using Standardized SchemasKashif Rabbani, Matteo Lissandrini, Angela Bonifati, Katja HoseSIGMOD 2025 · 13 citations
- Goal-Driven Reasoning in DatalogMTL with Magic SetsShaoyu Wang, Kaiyue Zhao, Dongliang Wei, Przemyslaw Andrzej Walega et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Common Foundations for SHACL, ShEx, and PG-SchemaShqiponja Ahmetaj, Iovka Boneva, Jan Hidders, Katja Hose et al.WWW 2025 · 10 citations
