Less is More: Mitigating Multimodal Hallucination from an EOS Decision Perspective
Zihao Yue, Liang Zhang, Qin Jin
Abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often suffer from multimodal hallucinations, wherein they may create content that is not present in the visual inputs. In this paper, we explore a new angle of this issue: overly detailed training data hinders the model's ability to timely terminate generation, leading to continued outputs beyond visual perception limits. By investigating how the model decides to terminate generation with EOS, the special end-of-sentence token, we find that the model assesses the completeness of the entire sequence by comparing the generated text with the image. This observation suggests that the model possesses an inherent potential of making proper EOS decisions based on its visual perception to avoid overly lengthy outputs. To take advantage of such potential, we explore two methods to mitigate multimodal hallucinations: a training objective that enables the model to reduce hallucinations by learning from regular instruction data, and a data filtering strategy to prevent harmful training data from exacerbating model hallucinations. Both methods significantly improve the hallucination performance of LVLMs, without requiring any additional data or knowledge.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2936e342-a27d-4818-9ea8-d3b0bc308b9aCited by top-tier papers53
- Mitigating Object Hallucination via Concentric Causal AttentionYun Xing, Yiheng Li, Ivan Laptev, Shijian LuNeurIPS 2024 · 78 citations
- Generate, but Verify: Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models with Retrospective ResamplingTsung-Han Wu, Heekyung Lee, Jiaxin Ge, Joseph E. Gonzalez et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 33 citations
- Activation Steering Decoding: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models through Bidirectional Hidden State InterventionJingran Su, Jingfan Chen, Hongxin Li, Yuntao Chen et al.ACL 2025 · 24 citations
- Cross-Modal Attention Calibration for LVLM Hallucination MitigationJiaming Li, Jiacheng Zhang, Zequn Jie, Lin Ma et al.CVPR 2026 · 23 citations
- Visual Multi-Agent System: Mitigating Hallucination Snowballing via Visual FlowXinlei Yu, Chengming Xu, Guibin Zhang, Yongbo He et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
- Hallucinatory Image Tokens: A Training-Free EAZY Approach to Detecting and Mitigating Object Hallucinations in LVLMsLiwei Che, Tony Qingze Liu, Jing Jia, Weiyi Qin et al.ICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- Understanding and Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Modular Attribution and InterventionTianyun Yang, Ziniu Li, Juan Cao, Chang XuICLR 2025
- Why LVLMs are More Prone to Hallucinations in Longer Responses: The Role of ContextGe Zheng, Jiaye Qian, Jiajin Tang, Sibei YangICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- Self-Correcting Decoding with Generative Feedback for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language ModelsCe Zhang, Zifu Wan, Zhehan Kan, Martin Q. Ma et al.ICLR 2025
