Checking Chase Termination over Ontologies of Existential Rules with Equality
David Carral, Jacopo Urbani
Abstract
The chase is a sound and complete algorithm for conjunctive query answering over ontologies of existential rules with equality. To enable its effective use, we can apply acyclicity notions; that is, sufficient conditions that guarantee chase termination. Unfortunately, most of these notions have only been defined for existential rule sets without equality. A proposed solution to circumvent this issue is to treat equality as an ordinary predicate with an explicit axiomatisation. We empirically show that this solution is not efficient in practice and propose an alternative approach. More precisely, we show that, if the chase terminates for any equality axiomatisation of an ontology, then it terminates for the original ontology (which may contain equality). Therefore, one can apply existing acyclicity notions to check chase termination over an axiomatisation of an ontology and then use the original ontology for reasoning. We show that, in practice, doing so results in a more efficient reasoning procedure. Furthermore, we present equality model-faithful acyclicity, a general acyclicity notion that can be directly applied to ontologies with equality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 29025e9e-a221-41dc-943a-589bf0f4ac7fCited by top-tier papers2
- Exploiting the Power of Equality-generating Dependencies in Ontological ReasoningLuigi Bellomarini, Davide Benedetto, Matteo Brandetti, Emanuel SallingerVLDB 2022 · 5 citations
- General Acyclicity and Cyclicity Notions for the Disjunctive Skolem ChaseLukas Gerlach, David CarralAAAI 2023 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Semi-Oblivious Chase Termination for Linear Existential Rules: An Experimental StudyMarco Calautti, Mostafa Milani, Andreas PierisVLDB 2023 · 2 citations
- Answering Queries with Negation over Existential RulesStefan Ellmauthaler, Markus Krötzsch, Stephan MennickeAAAI 2022 · 6 citations
- ForBackBench: A Benchmark for Chasing vs. Query-RewritingAfnan G. Alhazmi, Tom Blount, George KonstantinidisVLDB 2022 · 9 citations
- Answering Conjunctive Queries with Inequalities in DL-LiteℛGianluca Cima, Maurizio Lenzerini, Antonella PoggiAAAI 2020 · 10 citations
- Materializing Knowledge Bases via Trigger GraphsEfthymia Tsamoura, David Carral, Enrico Malizia, Jacopo UrbaniVLDB 2021 · 34 citations
