Complexity of Reasoning with Cardinality Minimality Conditions
Nadia Creignou, Frédéric Olive, Johannes Schmidt
Abstract
Many AI-related reasoning problems are based on the problem of satisfiability of propositional formulas with some cardinality-minimality condition. While the complexity of the satisfiability problem (SAT) is well understood when considering systematically all fragments of propositional logic within Schaefer's framework (STOC 1978) this is not the case when such minimality condition is added. We consider the CardMinSat problem, which asks, given a formula φ and an atom x, whether x is true in some cardinality-minimal model of φ. We completely classify the computational complexity of the CardMinSat problem within Schaefer's framework, thus paving the way for a better understanding of the tractability frontier of many AI-related reasoning problems. To this end we use advanced algebraic tools developed by (Schnoor & Schnoor 2008) and (Lagerkvist 2014).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 28ddcc85-dd65-40d2-b561-90bcd730f2c8Related papers
- Network Satisfaction for Symmetric Relation Algebras with a Flexible AtomManuel Bodirsky, Simon KnäuerAAAI 2021 · 7 citations
- Parameterized Complexity of Logic-Based Argumentation in Schaefer's FrameworkYasir Mahmood, Arne Meier, Johannes SchmidtAAAI 2021 · 3 citations
- Natural Language Satisfiability: Exploring the Problem Distribution and Evaluating Transformer-based Language ModelsTharindu Madusanka, Ian Pratt-Hartmann, Riza Batista-NavarroACL 2024
- From Clauses to KlausesJoseph E. Reeves, Marijn J. H. Heule, Randal E. BryantCAV 2024 · 2 citations
- Constraint Satisfaction Problems over Finite StructuresLibor Barto, William J. DeMeo, Antoine MottetLICS 2021 · 2 citations
