Formal Quality Measures for Predictors in Markov Decision Processes
Christel Baier, Sascha Klüppelholz, Jakob Piribauer, Robin Ziemek
Abstract
In adaptive systems, predictors are used to anticipate changes in the system’s state or behavior that may require system adaption, e.g., changing its configuration or adjusting resource allocation. Therefore, the quality of predictors is crucial for the overall reliability and performance of the system under control. This paper studies predictors in systems exhibiting probabilistic and non-deterministic behavior modelled as Markov decision processes (MDPs). Main contributions are the introduction of quantitative notions that measure the effectiveness of predictors in terms of their average capability to predict the occurrence of failures or other undesired system behaviors. The average is taken over all memoryless policies. We study two classes of such notions. One class is inspired by concepts that have been introduced in statistical analysis to explain the impact of features on the decisions of binary classifiers (such as precision, recall, f-score). Second, we study a measure that borrows ideas from recent work on probability-raising causality in MDPs and determines the quality of a predictor by the fraction of memoryless policies under which (the set of states in) the predictor is a probability-raising cause for the considered failure scenario.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 288db1ce-0f5c-4d74-8906-c5aba5111720Builds on4
- A Causal Analysis of HarmSander Beckers, Hana Chockler, Joseph Y. HalpernNeurIPS 2022 · 25 citations
- Runtime Monitors for Markov Decision ProcessesSebastian Junges, Hazem Torfah, Sanjit A. SeshiaCAV 2021 · 25 citations
- Backward Responsibility in Transition Systems Using General Power IndicesChristel Baier, Roxane van den Bossche, Sascha Klüppelholz, Johannes Lehmann et al.AAAI 2024 · 4 citations
- Responsibility and verification: Importance value in temporal logicsCorto Mascle, Christel Baier, Florian Funke, Simon Jantsch et al.LICS 2021 · 1 citation
Related papers
- On Measuring Influence in Avoiding Undesired FutureLue Tao, Tian-Zuo Wang, Yuan Jiang, Zhi-Hua ZhouICLR 2026
- Reinforcement Learning of Risk-Constrained Policies in Markov Decision ProcessesTomás Brázdil, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Petr Novotný, Jiri VahalaAAAI 2020 · 5 citations
- Measuring What Matters: Scenario-Driven Evaluation for Trajectory Predictors in Autonomous DrivingLongchao Da, David Isele, Hua Wei, Manish SaroyaAAAI 2026
- Optimizing for the Future in Non-Stationary MDPsYash Chandak, Georgios Theocharous, Shiv Shankar, Martha White et al.ICML 2020 · 72 citations
- A Geometric Approach to Predicting Bounds of Downstream Model PerformanceBrian J. Goode, Debanjan DattaKDD 2020
