USENIX Security2017Top-tier venue
Transcend: Detecting Concept Drift in Malware Classification Models
Roberto Jordaney, Kumar Sharad, Santanu Kumar Dash, Zhi Wang, Davide Papini, Ilia Nouretdinov, Lorenzo Cavallaro
Abstract
Building machine learning models of malware behavior is widely accepted as a panacea towards effective malware classification. A crucial requirement for building sustainable learning models, though, is to train on a wide variety of malware samples. Unfortunately, malware evolves rapidly and it thus becomes hard-if not impossible-to generalize learning models to reflect future, previously-unseen behaviors. Consequently, most malware classifiers become unsustainable in the long run, becoming rapidly antiquated as malware continues to evolve. In this work, we propose Transcend, a framework to identify aging classification models in vivo during deployment, much before the machine learning model's performance starts to degrade. This is a significant departure from conventional approaches that retrain aging models retrospectively when poor performance is observed. Our approach uses a statistical comparison of samples seen during deployment with those used to train the model, thereby building metrics for prediction quality. We show how Transcend can be used to identify concept drift based on two separate case studies on Android and Windows malware, raising a red flag before the model starts making consistently poor decisions due to out-of-date training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 28499d13-4d47-4a42-94c6-6fd5f0d551dcCited by top-tier papers41
- TESSERACT: Eliminating Experimental Bias in Malware Classification across Space and TimeFeargus Pendlebury, Fabio Pierazzi, Roberto Jordaney, Johannes Kinder et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 441 citations
- CADE: Detecting and Explaining Concept Drift Samples for Security ApplicationsLimin Yang, Wenbo Guo, Qingying Hao, Arridhana Ciptadi et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 241 citations
- Enhancing State-of-the-art Classifiers with API Semantics to Detect Evolved Android MalwareXiaohan Zhang, Yuan Zhang, Ming Zhong, Daizong Ding et al.CCS 2020 · 173 citations
- SoK: The Faults in our ASRs: An Overview of Attacks against Automatic Speech Recognition and Speaker Identification SystemsHadi Abdullah, Kevin Warren, Vincent Bindschaedler, Nicolas Papernot et al.S&P 2021 · 145 citations
- Transcending TRANSCEND: Revisiting Malware Classification in the Presence of Concept DriftFederico Barbero, Feargus Pendlebury, Fabio Pierazzi, Lorenzo CavallaroS&P 2022 · 124 citations
Related papers
- Continuous Learning for Android Malware DetectionYizheng Chen, Zhoujie Ding, David A. WagnerUSENIX Security 2023
- Combating Concept Drift with Explanatory Detection and Adaptation for Android Malware ClassificationYiling He, Junchi Lei, Zhan Qin, Kui Ren et al.CCS 2025 · 2 citations
- Revisiting Concept Drift in Windows Malware Detection: Adaptation to Real Drifted Malware with Minimal SamplesAdrian Shuai Li, Arun Iyengar, Ashish Kundu, Elisa BertinoNDSS 2025
- DRMD: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Malware Detection Under Concept DriftShae McFadden, Myles Foley, Mario D'Onghia, Chris Hicks et al.AAAI 2026 · 7 citations
- LAMDA: A Longitudinal Android Malware Benchmark for Concept Drift AnalysisMd Ahsanul Haque, Ismail Hossain, Md Mahmuduzzaman Kamol, Md Jahangir Alam et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
