Benford's Curse: Tracing Digit Bias to Numerical Hallucination in LLMs
Jiandong Shao, Yao Lu, Jianfei Yang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance on complex reasoning tasks, yet they frequently fail on basic numerical problems, producing incorrect outputs. Inspired by Benford's Law, a statistical pattern in which lower digits occur more frequently as leading digits, we hypothesize that the skewed digit distributions in web-collected corpora may be learned by LLMs during pretraining, leading to biased numerical generation. To investigate the hypothesis, we first examine whether digits frequencies in pretraining corpus (OLMo2) follows Benford's law. We then construct an evaluation benchmark in which the ground-truth digits are uniformly distributed within each of the seven numerical reasoning tasks. Our evaluation results demonstrate that leading open-source LLMs show a consistent pattern of digit bias that resembles Benford's law. Through logit-lens tracing and neuron-level dissection, we identify that this bias arises predominantly from a small subset of highly digit-selective feed-forward network (FFN) neurons in the deeper layers. Finally, we demonstrate that pruning these neurons mitigates imbalanced overgeneration and partially corrects erroneous outputs, providing causal evidence that fine-grained pretraining digit bias can propagate into model behavior. Our findings reveal a fundamental connection between corpus-level statistics and symbolic failure modes in LLMs, offering a new lens for diagnosing and mitigating hallucinations in numerical tasks. Code and data is made available here: https://github.com/shamy28/Benford-Curse.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- FoNE: Precise Single-Token Number Embeddings via Fourier FeaturesTianyi Zhou, Deqing Fu, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi, Robin Jia et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
- Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Enhances Activation Intensity and Diversity in the Internal Circuitry of LLMsHonglin Zhang, Qianyue Hao, Fengli Xu, Yong LiICLR 2026 · 9 citations
Builds on14
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Llemma: An Open Language Model for MathematicsZhangir Azerbayev, Hailey Schoelkopf, Keiran Paster, Marco Dos Santos et al.ICLR 2024 · 433 citations
Related papers
- Are Language Models Any Good at Density Modeling?Sriram Ranga, Sai Shashank Bedampeta, Rui Mao, Anupam ChattopadhyayAAAI 2026
- Do Large Language Models Truly Grasp Addition? A Rule-Focused Diagnostic Using Two-Integer ArithmeticYang Yan, Yu Lu, Renjun Xu, Zhenzhong LanEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Injecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language ModelsMor Geva, Ankit Gupta, Jonathan BerantACL 2020 · 12 citations
- Arithmetic Without Algorithms: Language Models Solve Math with a Bag of HeuristicsYaniv Nikankin, Anja Reusch, Aaron Mueller, Yonatan BelinkovICLR 2025
- JudgeBoard: Benchmarking and Enhancing Small Language Models for Reasoning EvaluationZhenyu Bi, Gaurav Srivastava, Yang Li, Swastik Roy et al.AAAI 2026
