Pull Requests as a Training Signal for Repo-Level Code Editing
Qinglin Zhu, Tianyu Chen, Shuai Lu, Lei Ji, Runcong Zhao, Murong Ma, Xiangxiang Dai, Yulan He, Lin Gui, Peng CHENG, Yeyun Gong
Abstract
Repository-level code editing requires models to understand complex dependencies and execute precise multi-file modifications across a large codebase. While recent gains on SWE-bench rely heavily on complex agent scaffolding, it remains unclear how much of this capability can be internalised via high-quality training signals. To address this, we propose Clean Pull Request (Clean-PR), a mid-training paradigm that leverages real-world GitHub pull requests as a training signal for repository-level editing. We introduce a scalable pipeline that converts noisy pull request diffs into Search/Replace edit blocks through reconstruction and validation, resulting in the largest publicly available corpus of 2 million pull requests spanning 12 programming languages. Using this training signal, we perform a mid-training stage followed by an agentless-aligned supervised fine-tuning process with error-driven data augmentation. On SWE-bench, our model significantly outperforms the instruction-tuned baseline, achieving absolute improvements of 13.6% on SWE-bench Lite and 12.3% on SWE-bench Verified. These results demonstrate that repository-level code understanding and editing capabilities can be effectively internalised into model weights under a simplified, agentless protocol, without relying on heavy inference-time scaffolding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on13
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- Automating code review activities by large-scale pre-trainingZhiyu Li, Shuai Lu, Daya Guo, Nan Duan et al.FSE 2022 · 195 citations
- AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program ImprovementYuntong Zhang, Haifeng Ruan, Zhiyu Fan, Abhik RoychoudhuryISSTA 2024 · 96 citations
- What Makes a Good Commit Message?Yingchen Tian, Yuxia Zhang, Klaas-Jan Stol, Lin Jiang et al.ICSE 2022 · 90 citations
Related papers
- SWE-rebench V2: Language-Agnostic SWE Task Collection at ScaleIbragim Badertdinov, Maksim Nekrashevich, Anton Shevtsov, Aleksandr GolubevICML 2026 · 13 citations
- daVinci-Dev: Agent-native Mid-training for Software EngineeringJi Zeng, Dayuan Fu, Tiantian Mi, Zhuang Yumin et al.ICML 2026 · 13 citations
- SWE-Perf: Can Language Models Optimize Code Performance on Real-World Repositories?Xinyi He, Qian Liu, Mingzhe Du, Lin Yan et al.ICML 2026 · 31 citations
- SWE-fficiency: Can Language Models Optimize Real-World Repositories on Real Workloads?Jeffrey Ma, Milad Hashemi, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, Kevin Swersky et al.ICML 2026 · 13 citations
- NextCoder: Robust Adaptation of Code LMs to Diverse Code EditsTushar Aggarwal, Swayam Singh, Abhijeet Awasthi, Aditya Kanade et al.ICML 2025
