Queens are Powerful too: Mitigating Gender Bias in Dialogue Generation
Emily Dinan, Angela Fan, Adina Williams, Jack Urbanek, Douwe Kiela, Jason Weston
Abstract
Models often easily learn biases present in the training data, and their predictions directly reflect this bias. We analyze gender bias in dialogue data, and examine how this bias is actually amplified in subsequent generative chit-chat dialogue models. We measure gender bias in six existing dialogue datasets, and focus on the most biased one, the multiplayer text-based fantasy adventure dataset LIGHT (Urbanek et al., 2019), as a testbed for our bias mitigation techniques. The LIGHT dataset is highly imbalanced with respect to gender, containing predominantly male characters, likely because it is entirely collected by crowdworkers and reflects common biases that exist in fantasy or medieval settings. We consider three techniques to mitigate gender bias: counterfactual data augmentation, targeted data collection, and bias controlled training. We show that our proposed techniques mitigate gender bias in LIGHT by balancing the genderedness of generated dialogue utterances and are particularly effective in combination. We quantify performance using various evaluation methods-such as quantity of gendered words, a dialogue safety classifier, and human studies-all of which show that our models generate less gendered, but equally engaging chit-chat responses.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 27e0aa70-2c59-4aa9-b3f8-3ecd3ec29d14Cited by top-tier papers40
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language ModelsPaul Pu Liang, Chiyu Wu, Louis-Philippe Morency, Ruslan SalakhutdinovICML 2021 · 495 citations
- An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language ModelsNicholas Meade, Elinor Poole-Dayan, Siva ReddyACL 2022 · 160 citations
- Explaining the Efficacy of Counterfactually Augmented DataDivyansh Kaushik, Amrith Setlur, Eduard H. Hovy, Zachary Chase LiptonICLR 2021 · 89 citations
Builds on7
- Towards Debiasing Sentence RepresentationsPaul Pu Liang, Irene Mengze Li, Emily Zheng, Yao Chong Lim et al.ACL 2020 · 149 citations
- Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPSu Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé III, Hanna M. WallachACL 2020 · 68 citations
- Double-Hard Debias: Tailoring Word Embeddings for Gender Bias MitigationTianlu Wang, Xi Victoria Lin, Nazneen Fatema Rajani, Bryan McCann et al.ACL 2020 · 42 citations
- Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference ResolutionYang Trista Cao, Hal Daumé IIIACL 2020 · 20 citations
- CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language ModelsNikita Nangia, Clara Vania, Rasika Bhalerao, Samuel R. BowmanEMNLP 2020 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Mitigating Gender Bias for Neural Dialogue Generation with Adversarial LearningHaochen Liu, Wentao Wang, Yiqi Wang, Hui Liu et al.EMNLP 2020 · 55 citations
- GenderAlign: An Alignment Dataset for Mitigating Gender Bias in Large Language ModelsTao Zhang, Ziqian Zeng, Yuxiang Xiao, Huiping Zhuang et al.ACL 2025 · 18 citations
- CHBias: Bias Evaluation and Mitigation of Chinese Conversational Language ModelsJiaxu Zhao, Meng Fang, Zijing Shi, Yitong Li et al.ACL 2023 · 11 citations
- Situated Dialogue Learning through Procedural Environment GenerationPrithviraj Ammanabrolu, Renee Jia, Mark O. RiedlACL 2022
- Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias ClassificationEmily Dinan, Angela Fan, Ledell Wu, Jason Weston et al.EMNLP 2020 · 7 citations
