Bridging Draft Policy Misalignment: Group Tree Optimization for Speculative Decoding
Shijing Hu, Jingyang Li, Zhihui Lu, Pan Zhou
Abstract
Speculative decoding accelerates large language model (LLM) inference by letting a lightweight draft model propose multiple tokens that the target model verifies in parallel. Yet existing training objectives optimize only a single greedy draft path, while decoding follows a tree policy that re-ranks and verifies multiple branches. This draft policy misalignment limits achievable speedups. We introduce Group Tree Optimization (GTO), which aligns training with the decoding-time tree policy through two components: (i) Draft Tree Reward, a sampling-free objective equal to the expected acceptance length of the draft tree under the target model, directly measuring decoding performance; (ii) Group-based Draft Policy Training, a stable optimization scheme that contrasts trees from the current and a frozen reference draft model, forming debiased group-standardized advantages and applying a PPO-style surrogate along the longest accepted sequence for robust updates. We further prove that increasing our Draft Tree Reward provably improves acceptance length and speedup. Across dialogue (MT-Bench), code (HumanEval), and math (GSM8K), and multiple LLMs (e.g., LLaMA-3.1-8B, LLaMA-3.3-70B, Vicuna-1.3-13B, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-LLaMA-8B, Qwen3-8B), GTO increases acceptance length by and yields an additional speedup over prior state-of-the-art EAGLE-3. By bridging draft policy misalignment, GTO offers a practical, general solution for efficient LLM inference. Code and draft models are available at https://github.com/hsj576/GTO.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 27c08fcb-0fe9-4840-90a8-224968057fb1Cited by top-tier papers2
- Flatter Tokens are More Valuable for Speculative Draft Model TrainingJiaming Fan, Daming Cao, Xiangzhong Luo, Jiale Fu et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Variational Speculative Decoding: Rethinking Draft Training from Token Likelihood to Sequence AcceptanceXiandong Zou, Jianshu Li, Jing Huang, Pan ZhouICML 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on13
- Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative DecodingYaniv Leviathan, Matan Kalman, Yossi MatiasICML 2023 · 1,472 citations
- EAGLE-3: Scaling up Inference Acceleration of Large Language Models via Training-Time TestYuhui Li, Fangyun Wei, Chao Zhang, Hongyang ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 347 citations
- Break the Sequential Dependency of LLM Inference Using Lookahead DecodingYichao Fu, Peter Bailis, Ion Stoica, Hao ZhangICML 2024 · 290 citations
- OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning ModelsEtash Kumar Guha, Ryan Marten, Sedrick Keh, Negin Raoof et al.ICLR 2026 · 235 citations
- Speculative Decoding with Big Little DecoderSehoon Kim, Karttikeya Mangalam, Suhong Moon, Jitendra Malik et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 212 citations
Related papers
- Learning To Draft: Adaptive Speculative Decoding with Reinforcement LearningJiebin Zhang, Zhenghan Yu, Liang Wang, Nan Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Not-a-Bandit: Provably No-Regret Drafter Selection in Speculative Decoding for LLMsHongyi Liu, Jiaji Huang, Zhen Jia, Youngsuk Park et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- LK Losses: Direct Acceptance Rate Optimization for Speculative DecodingAlexander Samarin, Sergei Krutikov, Anton Shevtsov, Sergei Skvortsov et al.ICML 2026 · 11 citations
- CORAL: Learning Consistent Representations across Multi-step Training with Lighter Speculative DrafterYepeng Weng, Dianwen Mei, Huishi Qiu, Xujie Chen et al.ACL 2025 · 6 citations
- GRIFFIN: Effective Token Alignment for Faster Speculative DecodingShijing Hu, Jingyang Li, Xingyu Xie, Zhihui Lu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
