On the Ability of Graph Neural Networks to Model Interactions Between Vertices
Noam Razin, Tom Verbin, Nadav Cohen
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used for modeling complex interactions between entities represented as vertices of a graph. Despite recent efforts to theoretically analyze the expressive power of GNNs, a formal characterization of their ability to model interactions is lacking. The current paper aims to address this gap. Formalizing strength of interactions through an established measure known as separation rank, we quantify the ability of certain GNNs to model interaction between a given subset of vertices and its complement, i.e. between the sides of a given partition of input vertices. Our results reveal that the ability to model interaction is primarily determined by the partition's walk index -- a graph-theoretical characteristic defined by the number of walks originating from the boundary of the partition. Experiments with common GNN architectures corroborate this finding. As a practical application of our theory, we design an edge sparsification algorithm named Walk Index Sparsification (WIS), which preserves the ability of a GNN to model interactions when input edges are removed. WIS is simple, computationally efficient, and in our experiments has markedly outperformed alternative methods in terms of induced prediction accuracy. More broadly, it showcases the potential of improving GNNs by theoretically analyzing the interactions they can model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 277ecf94-5d65-449e-a9b7-1a49e58dfcaeCited by top-tier papers3
- What Makes Data Suitable for a Locally Connected Neural Network? A Necessary and Sufficient Condition Based on Quantum EntanglementYotam Alexander, Nimrod De La Vega, Noam Razin, Nadav CohenNeurIPS 2023 · 8 citations
- A Tensor Decomposition Perspective on Second-order RNNsMaude Lizaire, Michael Rizvi-Martel, Marawan Gamal Abdel Hameed, Guillaume RabusseauICML 2024 · 3 citations
- TN-SHAP-G: Graph-Structured Tensor Network Surrogates for Shapley Values and InteractionsFarzaneh Heidari, Guillaume RabusseauICML 2026
Builds on32
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- Measuring and Relieving the Over-Smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological ViewDeli Chen, Yankai Lin, Wei Li, Peng Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 1,353 citations
- Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node ClassificationKenta Oono, Taiji SuzukiICLR 2020 · 864 citations
- Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvatureJake Topping, Francesco Di Giovanni, Benjamin Paul Chamberlain, Xiaowen Dong et al.ICLR 2022 · 628 citations
Related papers
- Demystifying Graph Sparsification Algorithms in Graph Properties PreservationYuhan Chen, Haojie Ye, Sanketh Vedula, Alex M. Bronstein et al.VLDB 2024 · 29 citations
- 𝒩-WL: A New Hierarchy of Expressivity for Graph Neural NetworksQing Wang, Dillon Ze Chen, Asiri Wijesinghe, Shouheng Li et al.ICLR 2023
- Interpretable Sparsification of Brain Graphs: Better Practices and Effective Designs for Graph Neural NetworksGaotang Li, Marlena Duda, Xiang Zhang, Danai Koutra et al.KDD 2023 · 7 citations
- Analyzing the Expressive Power of Graph Neural Networks in a Spectral PerspectiveMuhammet Balcilar, Guillaume Renton, Pierre Héroux, Benoit Gaüzère et al.ICLR 2021 · 44 citations
- Theoretically Improving Graph Neural Networks via Anonymous Walk Graph KernelsQingqing Long, Yilun Jin, Yi Wu, Guojie SongWWW 2021 · 42 citations
