Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics?
Pingchuan Ma, Lennart Rietdorf, Dmytro Kotovenko, Vincent Tao Hu, Björn Ommer
Abstract
Accurately describing images with text is a foundation of explainable AI. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) like CLIP have recently addressed this by aligning images and texts in a shared embedding space, expressing semantic similarities between vision and language embeddings. VLM classification can be improved with descriptions generated by Large Language Models (LLMs). However, it is difficult to determine the contribution of actual description semantics, as the performance gain may also stem from a semantic-agnostic ensembling effect, where multiple modified text prompts act as a noisy test-time augmentation for the original one. We propose an alternative evaluation scenario to decide if a performance boost of LLM-generated descriptions is caused by such a noise augmentation effect or rather by genuine description semantics. The proposed scenario avoids noisy test-time augmentation and ensures that genuine, distinctive descriptions cause the performance boost. Furthermore, we propose a training-free method for selecting discriminative descriptions that work independently of classname-ensembling effects. Our approach identifies descriptions that effectively differentiate classes within a local CLIP label neighborhood, improving classification accuracy across seven datasets. Additionally, we provide insights into the explainability of description-based image classification using VLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 276ceae5-a8d9-473d-b132-1e15761e2feeCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text SupervisionChao Jia, Yinfei Yang, Ye Xia, Yi-Ting Chen et al.ICML 2021 · 5,401 citations
- What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationSarah M. Pratt, Ian Covert, Rosanne Liu, Ali FarhadiICCV 2023 · 343 citations
- MixText: Linguistically-Informed Interpolation of Hidden Space for Semi-Supervised Text ClassificationJiaao Chen, Zichao Yang, Diyi YangACL 2020 · 340 citations
Related papers
- Learning to Prompt with Text Only Supervision for Vision-Language ModelsMuhammad Uzair Khattak, Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Muzammal Naseer, Luc Van Gool et al.AAAI 2025 · 52 citations
- Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad ConceptsKarsten Roth, Jae-Myung Kim, A. Sophia Koepke, Oriol Vinyals et al.ICCV 2023 · 124 citations
- From Local Details to Global Context: Advancing Vision-Language Models with Attention-Based SelectionLincan Cai, Jingxuan Kang, Shuang Li, Wenxuan Ma et al.ICML 2025
- Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Camouflaged Object Segmentation via Fine-Grained Object Binding and Adaptive Hybrid PromptPeng Ren, Cheng Jiang, Chuande Yang, Fuming Sun et al.CVPR 2026
- Visual Classification via Description from Large Language ModelsSachit Menon, Carl VondrickICLR 2023 · 57 citations
