Attention Sinks: A 'Catch, Tag, Release' Mechanism for Embeddings
Stephen Zhang, Mustafa Khan, Vardan Papyan
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often concentrate their attention on a few specific tokens referred to as attention sinks. Common examples include the first token, a prompt-independent sink, and punctuation tokens, which are prompt-dependent. While the tokens causing the sinks often lack direct semantic meaning, the presence of the sinks is critical for model performance, particularly under model compression and KV-caching. Despite their ubiquity, the function, semantic role, and origin of attention sinks -- especially those beyond the first token -- remain poorly understood. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive investigation demonstrating that attention sinks: catch a sequence of tokens, tag them using a common direction in embedding space, and release them back into the residual stream, where tokens are later retrieved based on the tags they have acquired. Probing experiments reveal these tags carry semantically meaningful information, such as the truth of a statement. These findings extend to reasoning models, where the mechanism spans more heads and explains greater variance in embeddings, or recent models with query-key normalization, where sinks remain just as prevalent. To encourage future theoretical analysis, we introduce a minimal problem which can be solved through the'catch, tag, release'mechanism, and where it emerges through training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- What are you sinking? A geometric approach on attention sinkValeria Ruscio, Umberto Nanni, Fabrizio SilvestriNeurIPS 2025 · 29 citations
- Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention SinkGuozhi Liu, Weiwei Lin, Tiansheng Huang, Ruichao Mo et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- FreeText: Training-Free Text Rendering via Attention Localization and Spectral Glyph InjectionRuiQiang Zhang, Hengyi Wang, Chang Liu, Guanjie Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Anatomy of Massive Activations and Attention SinksShangwen Sun, Alfredo Canziani, Yann LeCun, Jiachen ZhuICML 2026
- A Single Layer to Explain Them All: Understanding Massive Values in Large Language ModelsZeru Shi, Zhenting Wang, Fan Yang, Qifan Wang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention SinksGuangxuan Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Beidi Chen, Song Han et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,714 citations
- Vision Transformers Need RegistersTimothée Darcet, Maxime Oquab, Julien Mairal, Piotr BojanowskiICLR 2024 · 769 citations
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 592 citations
Related papers
- When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical ViewXiangming Gu, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Qian Liu et al.ICLR 2025
- To Sink or Not to Sink: Visual Information Pathways in Large Vision-Language ModelsJiayun Luo, Wan-Cyuan Fan, Lyuyang Wang, Xiangteng He et al.ICLR 2026 · 19 citations
- Attention Sinks as Internal Signals for Hallucination Detection in Large Language ModelsJakub Binkowski, Kamil Adamczewski, Tomasz KajdanowiczICML 2026
- Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same CoinEnrique Queipo-de-Llano, Alvaro Arroyo, Federico Barbero, Xiaowen Dong et al.ICLR 2026 · 56 citations
- The Structural Origin of Attention Sink: Variance Discrepancy, Super Neurons, and Dimension DisparitySiquan Li, Kaiqi Jiang, Jiacheng Sun, Tianyang HuICML 2026 · 1 citation
