Is Bang-Bang Control All You Need? Solving Continuous Control with Bernoulli Policies
Tim Seyde, Igor Gilitschenski, Wilko Schwarting, Bartolomeo Stellato, Martin A. Riedmiller, Markus Wulfmeier, Daniela Rus
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) for continuous control typically employs distributions whose support covers the entire action space. In this work, we investigate the colloquially known phenomenon that trained agents often prefer actions at the boundaries of that space. We draw theoretical connections to the emergence of bang-bang behavior in optimal control, and provide extensive empirical evaluation across a variety of recent RL algorithms. We replace the normal Gaussian by a Bernoulli distribution that solely considers the extremes along each action dimension - a bang-bang controller. Surprisingly, this achieves state-of-the-art performance on several continuous control benchmarks - in contrast to robotic hardware, where energy and maintenance cost affect controller choices. Since exploration, learning,and the final solution are entangled in RL, we provide additional imitation learning experiments to reduce the impact of exploration on our analysis. Finally, we show that our observations generalize to environments that aim to model real-world challenges and evaluate factors to mitigate the emergence of bang-bang solutions. Our findings emphasize challenges for benchmarking continuous control algorithms, particularly in light of potential real-world applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2750b23a-6a45-421a-9044-e943db2efd94Cited by top-tier papers13
- Continuous Control with Action Quantization from DemonstrationsRobert Dadashi, Léonard Hussenot, Damien Vincent, Sertan Girgin et al.ICML 2022 · 32 citations
- Deep Policy Gradient Methods Without Batch Updates, Target Networks, or Replay BuffersGautham Vasan, Mohamed Elsayed, Seyed Alireza Azimi, Jiamin He et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Simple Sequence PriorsTankred Saanum, Noémi Élteto, Peter Dayan, Marcel Binz et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 18 citations
- Stochastic Q-learning for Large Discrete Action SpacesFares Fourati, Vaneet Aggarwal, Mohamed-Slim AlouiniICML 2024 · 9 citations
- REValueD: Regularised Ensemble Value-Decomposition for Factorisable Markov Decision ProcessesDavid Ireland, Giovanni MontanaICLR 2024 · 6 citations
Builds on4
- Mastering Atari with Discrete World ModelsDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Mohammad Norouzi, Jimmy BaICLR 2021 · 1,170 citations
- Discretizing Continuous Action Space for On-Policy OptimizationYunhao Tang, Shipra AgrawalAAAI 2020 · 150 citations
- Growing Action SpacesGregory Farquhar, Laura Gustafson, Zeming Lin, Shimon Whiteson et al.ICML 2020 · 48 citations
- Striving for Simplicity and Performance in Off-Policy DRL: Output Normalization and Non-Uniform SamplingChe Wang, Yanqiu Wu, Quan Vuong, Keith W. RossICML 2020 · 38 citations
Related papers
- Truncated Gaussian Policy for Debiased Continuous ControlGanghun Lee, Minji Kim, Minsu Lee, Byoung-Tak ZhangAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Analyzing Generalization in Policy Networks: A Case Study with the Double-Integrator SystemRuining Zhang, Haoran Han, Maolong Lv, Qisong Yang et al.AAAI 2024 · 5 citations
- What Matters for On-Policy Deep Actor-Critic Methods? A Large-Scale StudyMarcin Andrychowicz, Anton Raichuk, Piotr Stanczyk, Manu Orsini et al.ICLR 2021 · 52 citations
- Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian MethodsAdam Stooke, Joshua Achiam, Pieter AbbeelICML 2020 · 403 citations
- Prediction-Guided Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Robot ControlJie Xu, Yunsheng Tian, Pingchuan Ma, Daniela Rus et al.ICML 2020 · 210 citations
