Gradient-Direction-Aware Density Control for 3D Gaussian Splatting
Zheng Zhou, Yu-Jie Xiong, Jia-Chen Zhang, Chun-Ming Xia, Xihe Qiu, Hongjian Zhan
Abstract
The emergence of 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has significantly advanced Novel View Synthesis (NVS) through explicit scene representation, enabling real-time photorealistic rendering. However, existing approaches manifest two critical limitations in complex scenarios: (1) Over-reconstruction occurs when persistent large Gaussians cannot meet adaptive splitting thresholds during density control. This is exacerbated by conflicting gradient directions that prevent effective splitting of these Gaussians; (2) Over-densification of Gaussians occurs in regions with aligned gradient aggregation, leading to redundant component proliferation. This redundancy significantly increases memory overhead due to unnecessary data retention. We present Gradient-Direction-Aware Gaussian Splatting (GDAGS) to address these challenges. Our key innovations: the Gradient Coherence Ratio (GCR), computed through normalized gradient vector norms, which explicitly discriminates Gaussians with concordant versus conflicting gradient directions; and a nonlinear dynamic weighting mechanism leverages the GCR to enable gradient-direction-aware density control. Specifically, GDAGS prioritizes conflicting-gradient Gaussians during splitting operations to enhance geometric details while suppressing redundant concordant-direction Gaussians. Conversely, in cloning processes, GDAGS promotes concordant-direction Gaussian densification for structural completion while preventing conflicting-direction Gaussian overpopulation. Comprehensive evaluations across diverse real-world benchmarks demonstrate that GDAGS achieves superior rendering quality while effectively mitigating over-reconstruction, suppressing over-densification, and constructing compact scene representations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 27402aca-1b1f-42d7-800f-02e39ac41e80Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on19
- 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field RenderingBernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimkühler, George DrettakisSIGGRAPH 2023 · 5,687 citations
- Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encodingThomas Müller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, Alexander KellerSIGGRAPH 2022 · 4,089 citations
- Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance FieldsJonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Matthew Tancik, Peter Hedman et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,700 citations
- Mip-NeRF 360: Unbounded Anti-Aliased Neural Radiance FieldsJonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan et al.CVPR 2022 · 1,603 citations
- Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural NetworksSara Fridovich-Keil, Alex Yu, Matthew Tancik, Qinhong Chen et al.CVPR 2022 · 1,237 citations
Related papers
- AbsGS: Recovering Fine Details in 3D Gaussian SplattingZongxin Ye, Wenyu Li, Sidun Liu, Peng Qiao et al.ACM MM 2024 · 87 citations
- Re-Activating Frozen Primitives for 3D Gaussian SplattingYuxin Cheng, Binxiao Huang, Wenyong Zhou, Taiqiang Wu et al.ACM MM 2025 · 2 citations
- DGS: Depth-and-Density Guided Gaussian Splatting for Stable and Accurate Sparse-View ReconstructionMeixi Song, Xin Lin, Dizhe Zhang, Haodong Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- CaDGS: Modeling Inter-Gaussian Mutual Information for Dynamic Novel View SynthesisYunlong Zhao, Xiaoheng Deng, Zhuohua Qiu, Feng Yang et al.ACM MM 2025
- PCGS: Deblurring 3D Gaussian Splatting with Patch ComparisonYilong Li, Bo Pang, Zhongtao Wang, Mai Su et al.ICML 2026
