SimPhony: A Device-Circuit-Architecture Cross-Layer Modeling and Simulation Framework for Heterogeneous Electronic-Photonic AI System
Ziang Yin, Meng Zhang, Nicholas Gangi, Z. Rena Huang, Jeff Jun Zhang, Jiaqi Gu
Abstract
Electronic-photonic integrated circuits (EPICs) offer transformative potential for next-generation high-performance AI but require interdisciplinary advances across devices, circuits, architecture, and design automation. The complexity of hybrid systems makes it challenging even for domain experts to understand distinct behaviors and interactions across design stack. The lack of a flexible, accurate, fast, and easy-to-use EPIC AI system simulation framework significantly limits the exploration of hardware innovations and system evaluations on common benchmarks. To address this gap, we propose SimPhony 1 , a cross-layer modeling and simulation framework for heterogeneous electronic-photonic AI systems. SimPhony offers a platform that enables (1) generic, extensible hardware topology representation that supports heterogeneous multi-core architectures with diverse photonic tensor core designs; (2) optics-specific dataflow modeling with unique multi-dimensional parallelism and reuse beyond spatial/temporal dimensions; (3) data-aware energy modeling with realistic device responses, layout-aware area estimation, link budget analysis, and bandwidth-adaptive memory modeling; and (4) seamless integration with model training framework for hardware/software co-simulation. By providing a unified, versatile, and high-fidelity simulation platform, SimPhony enables researchers to innovate and evaluate EPIC AI hardware across multiple domains, facilitating the next leap in emerging AI hardware.
Heterogeneous electronic-photonic integrated circuits (EPICs) are emerging as a next-generation platform for high-performance artificial intelligence (AI) computing. Demonstrated optical neural networks (ONNs) showcase breakthroughs in their performance and efficiency [1]-[9]. Many research focuses on materials, devices, and circuits to overcome technological barriers in photonic AI. Some crosslayer co-design [10]-[14] and architecture optimization [4], [5], [15]-[19] research have scaled these systems for real-world AI tasks. Exploring the full stack of EPIC AI systems demands expertise across physics, device design, analog circuits, system architecture, electronic-photonic design automation (EPDA), and AI algorithms, as system-level evaluation is critical to understanding innovations at each individual design layer.
However, the complexity of such hybrid system makes it challenging even for experts to grasp the behavior of each component and its interactions across software and hardware. Key challenges include: ➊ Lack of Unified Representation of Distinct PTC Circuit Topology: Photonic tensor cores (PTCs) employ diverse optical principles for matrix computation, e.g., 1 We open-source our codes at https://github.com/ScopeX-ASU/SimPhony magnitude/phase modulation, wavelength/mode/time-division multiplexing (WDM, MDM, TDM), interference, diffraction, etc. Such abundant design flexibility creates various PTC circuit topologies, e.g., weight bank [20], triangular mesh [1], [21], rectangular mesh [22], butterfly mesh [3], crossbar [2], [4], [17], single WDM link [23], etc.
Prior simulators are modified from digital tools [24] that only support array-like computing architectures and cannot represent diverse PTC topologies. ➋ Lack of Support for Optics-Specific Dataflow and Parallelism: EPIC AI systems involve parallelism and resource sharing beyond temporal/spatial dimensions. The combination of optical broadcasting, hierarchical accumulation, and multi-dimensional reuse patterns results in a complex dataflow. The additional optical dimensions, like magnitude/phase, wavelength, polarization, and modes, further complicate the design space. Thus, a flexible framework tailored to optics-specific needs is required. ➌ Lack of Accurate Model-Circuit-Layout Co-Modeling: Unlike digital AI accelerators, analog systems integrate models tightly with devices/circuits, leading to inaccuracies in energy modeling due to unawareness of real workload data and precise device settings. Beyond simple analytical models, there is a strong need to incorporate rigorous simulations and even chip measurements into energy analysis. Additionally, existing EPIC design tools overlook the layout when estimating the chip area. Previous methods [4], [25], [26] aggregate device footprints, leading to an underestimate of area. Therefore, a fast yet accurate layout estimator is essential for more reliable area analysis.
In this work, we present SimPhony, an open-source crosslayer modeling and simulation framework for heterogeneous EPIC AI systems. Built with a customized EPIC device library, SimPhony enables the hierarchical construction of heterogeneous photonic architectures from arbitrary PTC circuit topologies. Integrated with the ONN training library, SimPhony enables end-to-end simulation, including workload extraction, memory construction, and dataflow generation, while accurately analyzing system latency, data-aware energy, and layout-aware area.
Our main con
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 272b5055-2b76-4bd2-a8e4-8208dc308bdfBuilds on7
- SiP-ML: high-bandwidth optical network interconnects for machine learning trainingMehrdad Khani Shirkoohi, Manya Ghobadi, Mohammad Alizadeh, Ziyi Zhu et al.SIGCOMM 2021 · 94 citations
- PIXEL: Photonic Neural Network AcceleratorKyle Shiflett, Dylan Wright, Avinash Karanth, Ahmed LouriHPCA 2020 · 56 citations
- Albireo: Energy-Efficient Acceleration of Convolutional Neural Networks via Silicon PhotonicsKyle Shiflett, Avinash Karanth, Razvan C. Bunescu, Ahmed LouriISCA 2021 · 44 citations
- L2ight: Enabling On-Chip Learning for Optical Neural Networks via Efficient in-situ Subspace OptimizationJiaqi Gu, Hanqing Zhu, Chenghao Feng, Zixuan Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 41 citations
- FLOPS: EFficient On-Chip Learning for OPtical Neural Networks Through Stochastic Zeroth-Order OptimizationJiaqi Gu, Zheng Zhao, Chenghao Feng, Wuxi Li et al.DAC 2020 · 20 citations
Related papers
- EPIC: Abstraction and Polymorphism of In-Network Collectives on EthernetYitao Yuan, Jianglong Nie, Tianyu Bai, Ruizhe Zhou et al.SIGCOMM 2026 · 1 citation
- ADEPT: automatic differentiable DEsign of photonic tensor coresJiaqi Gu, Hanqing Zhu, Chenghao Feng, Zixuan Jiang et al.DAC 2022 · 18 citations
- CHORD: Composable Hybrid Optical Reconfigurable Diffractive Framework For Optical Neural NetworkZiang Yin, Yu Yao, Jeff Zhang, Jiaqi GuDAC 2025 · 1 citation
- NeurOLight: A Physics-Agnostic Neural Operator Enabling Parametric Photonic Device SimulationJiaqi Gu, Zhengqi Gao, Chenghao Feng, Hanqing Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
- Enabling AI Network Cross-Layer Design and Operations with Arcadia: A Simulation Platform at ScaleZhaodong Wang, Satyajeet Singh Ahuja, Xu Zhang, Max Noormohammadpour et al.NSDI 2026 · 3 citations
