Robotic Characterization of Markerless Hand-Tracking on Meta Quest Pro and Quest 3 Virtual Reality Headsets
Eric Godden, William Steedman, Matthew K. X. J. Pan
Abstract
Markerless hand-tracking has become increasingly common on commercially available virtual and mixed reality headsets to improve the naturalness of interaction and immersivity of virtual environments. However, there has been limited examination of the performance of markerless hand-tracking on commercial head-mounted displays. Here, we propose an evaluation methodology that leverages a robotic manipulator to measure the positional accuracy, jitter, and latency of such systems and provides a standardized characterization framework of markerless hand-tracking. We apply this methodology to evaluate the hand-tracking performance of two recent mixed reality devices from Meta: the Quest Pro and Quest 3. Results demonstrate the influence of proximity to the headset, rotation of hand, and joint selected as the tracking feature on hand-tracking performance. We found that hand-tracking error and jitter were lowest for both headsets in conditions where the knuckle was the tracking point compared to the fingertip. Regarding positional accuracy, in best-performing conditions, the Quest Pro outperformed the Quest 3 with 1.22 cm of average error compared to 1.73 cm. The opposite result was true concerning jitter, with results of 1.77 cm and 1.11 cm for the Quest Pro and Quest 3, respectively. We found latency highly variable for the Quest Pro (15.8 - 229.2 ms) and Quest 3 (14.4 - 220.5 ms). This work provides a testing framework for highly systematic and repeatable performance measurements of markerless hand-tracking systems embedded in headsets.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 271d31ac-3ccb-4251-96a8-1980916d9b2bCited by top-tier papers3
- Eyes on Many: Evaluating Gaze, Hand, and Voice for Multi-Object Selection in Extended RealityMohammad Raihanul Bashar, Aunnoy K. Mutasim, Ken Pfeuffer, Anil Ufuk BatmazCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Rhythms of Recovery: Patient-Centered Virtual Reality Exergame for Physical Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care UnitSangjun Eom, Tianyi Hu, Wenyi Xu, Liheng Zou et al.IEEE VR 2026
- How Humans Naturally Refer to Targets: Understanding Multimodal Instruction Patterns in Human-Robot InteractionLesong Jia, Makayla Chang, Yu Liu, Na DuCHI 2026
Related papers
- Use Case Matters: Comparing the User Experience and Task Performance Across Tasks for Embodied Interaction in VRJonathan Tschanter, Christian Merz, Marie Luisa Fiedler, Carolin Wienrich et al.IEEE VR 2026
- Simultaneous Run-Time Measurement of Motion-to-Photon Latency and Latency JitterJan-Philipp Stauffert, Florian Niebling, Marc Erich LatoschikIEEE VR 2020 · 6 citations
- Leveling the Playing Field: A Comparative Reevaluation of Unmodified Eye Tracking as an Input and Interaction Modality for VRAjoy Savio Fernandes, T. Scott Murdison, Michael J. ProulxIEEE VR 2023 · 69 citations
- Aligning Realities: A Registration Pipeline for Arbitrary Objects in Mixed Reality Using Controller-Based Point SelectionDavid Mertens, Steffen-Sascha Stein, Kristoffer Waldow, Arnulph FuhrmannIEEE VR 2026 · 1 citation
- 3DRing: Enabling Low-Cost 3D Hand Position Tracking by Fusing Inertial and Low-Framerate Optical SensingZhuojun Li, Lubin Wang, Chun Yu, Chang Liu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
