Quantum isomorphism is equivalent to equality of homomorphism counts from planar graphs
Laura Mancinska, David E. Roberson
Abstract
Over 50 years ago, Lovász proved that two graphs are isomorphic if and only if they admit the same number of homomorphisms from any graph. Other equivalence relations on graphs, such as cospectrality or fractional isomorphism, can be characterized by equality of homomorphism counts from an appropriately chosen class of graphs. Dvořák [J. Graph Theory 2010] showed that taking this class to be the graphs of treewidth at most k yields a tractable relaxation of graph isomorphism known as k-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman equivalence. Together with a famous result of Cai, Fürer, and Immerman [FOCS 1989], this shows that homomorphism counts from graphs of bounded treewidth do not determine a graph up to isomorphism. Dell, Grohe, and Rattan [ICALP 2018] raised the questions of whether homomorphism counts from planar graphs determine a graph up to isomorphism, and what is the complexity of the resulting relation. We answer the former in the negative by showing that the resulting relation is equivalent to the so-called quantum isomorphism [Mančinska et al, ICALP 2017]. Using this equivalence, we further resolve the latter question, showing that testing whether two graphs have the same number of homomorphisms from any planar graph is, surprisingly, an undecidable problem, and moreover is complete for the class coRE (the complement of recursively enumerable problems). Quantum isomorphism is defined in terms of a one-round, two-prover interactive proof system in which quantum provers, who are allowed to share entanglement, attempt to convince the verifier that the graphs are isomorphic. Our combinatorial proof leverages the quantum automorphism group of a graph, a notion from noncommutative mathematics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers9
- Equivariant Polynomials for Graph Neural NetworksOmri Puny, Derek Lim, Bobak Toussi Kiani, Haggai Maron et al.ICML 2023 · 41 citations
- Counting Bounded Tree Depth HomomorphismsMartin GroheLICS 2020 · 21 citations
- The Pebble-Relation Comonad in Finite Model TheoryYoàv Montacute, Nihil ShahLICS 2022 · 7 citations
- The Complexity of Counting Planar Graph Homomorphisms of Domain Size 3Jin-Yi Cai, Ashwin MaranSTOC 2023 · 4 citations
- Weisfeiler-Leman and Graph SpectraGaurav Rattan, Tim SeppeltSODA 2023 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Distinguishing Graphs by Counting Homomorphisms from Sparse GraphsDaniel Neuen, Tim SeppeltLICS 2026
- On the Expressive Power of Homomorphism CountsAlbert Atserias, Phokion G. Kolaitis, Wei-Lin WuLICS 2021 · 5 citations
- Lovász-Type Theorems and Game ComonadsAnuj Dawar, Tomas Jakl, Luca ReggioLICS 2021 · 2 citations
- Expectation-Complete Graph Representations with HomomorphismsPascal Welke, Maximilian Thiessen, Fabian Jogl, Thomas GärtnerICML 2023 · 11 citations
- Deep Weisfeiler LemanMartin Grohe, Pascal Schweitzer, Daniel WiebkingSODA 2021 · 6 citations
