Bird's Eye: Probing for Linguistic Graph Structures with a Simple Information-Theoretic Approach
Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan
Abstract
NLP has a rich history of representing our prior understanding of language in the form of graphs. Recent work on analyzing contextualized text representations has focused on handdesigned probe models to understand how and to what extent do these representations encode a particular linguistic phenomenon. However, due to the inter-dependence of various phenomena and randomness of training probe models, detecting how these representations encode the rich information in these linguistic graphs remains a challenging problem. In this paper, we propose a new informationtheoretic probe, Bird's Eye, which is a fairly simple probe method for detecting if and how these representations encode the information in these linguistic graphs. Instead of using classifier performance, our probe takes an information-theoretic view of probing and estimates the mutual information between the linguistic graph embedded in a continuous space and the contextualized word representations. Furthermore, we also propose an approach to use our probe to investigate localized linguistic information in the linguistic graphs using perturbation analysis. We call this probing setup Worm's Eye. Using these probes, we analyze BERT models on their ability to encode a syntactic and a semantic graph structure, and find that these models encode to some degree both syntactic as well as semantic information; albeit syntactic information to a greater extent. Our implementation is available in https://github.com/ yifan-h/Graph_Probe-Birds_Eye .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Human Guided Exploitation of Interpretable Attention Patterns in Summarization and Topic SegmentationRaymond Li, Wen Xiao, Linzi Xing, Lanjun Wang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 4 citations
- Towards a Mechanistic Interpretation of Multi-Step Reasoning Capabilities of Language ModelsYifan Hou, Jiaoda Li, Yu Fei, Alessandro Stolfo et al.EMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
Builds on5
- Predicting Inductive Biases of Pre-Trained ModelsCharles Lovering, Rohan Jha, Tal Linzen, Ellie PavlickICLR 2021 · 70 citations
- Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description LengthElena Voita, Ivan TitovEMNLP 2020 · 34 citations
- Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic StructureTiago Pimentel, Josef Valvoda, Rowan Hall Maudslay, Ran Zmigrod et al.ACL 2020 · 21 citations
- VCDM: Leveraging Variational Bi-encoding and Deep Contextualized Word Representations for Improved Definition ModelingMachel Reid, Edison Marrese-Taylor, Yutaka MatsuoEMNLP 2020 · 14 citations
- Pareto Probing: Trading Off Accuracy for ComplexityTiago Pimentel, Naomi Saphra, Adina Williams, Ryan CotterellEMNLP 2020 · 6 citations
Related papers
- A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic ProbingKarolina Stanczak, Lucas Torroba Hennigen, Adina Williams, Ryan Cotterell et al.AAAI 2023 · 6 citations
- Intrinsic Probing through Dimension SelectionLucas Torroba Hennigen, Adina Williams, Ryan CotterellEMNLP 2020 · 3 citations
- Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTZhiyong Wu, Yun Chen, Ben Kao, Qun LiuACL 2020 · 158 citations
- Probing BERT in Hyperbolic SpacesBoli Chen, Yao Fu, Guangwei Xu, Pengjun Xie et al.ICLR 2021 · 19 citations
- Probing as Quantifying Inductive BiasAlexander Immer, Lucas Torroba Hennigen, Vincent Fortuin, Ryan CotterellACL 2022
