SEVurity: No Security Without Integrity : Breaking Integrity-Free Memory Encryption with Minimal Assumptions
Luca Wilke, Jan Wichelmann, Mathias Morbitzer, Thomas Eisenbarth
Abstract
One reason for not adopting cloud services is the required trust in the cloud provider: As they control the hypervisor, any data processed in the system is accessible to them. Full memory encryption for Virtual Machines (VM) protects against curious cloud providers as well as otherwise compromised hypervisors. AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) is the most prevalent hardware-based full memory encryption for VMs. Its newest extension, SEV-ES, also protects the entire VM state during context switches, aiming to ensure that the host neither learns anything about the data that is processed inside the VM, nor is able to modify its execution state. Several previous works have analyzed the security of SEV and have shown that, by controlling I/O, it is possible to exfiltrate data or even gain control over the VM’s execution. In this work, we introduce two new methods that allow us to inject arbitrary code into SEV-ES secured virtual machines. Due to the lack of proper integrity protection, it is sufficient to reuse existing ciphertext to build a high-speed encryption oracle. As a result, our attack no longer depends on control over the I/O, which is needed by prior attacks. As I/O manipulation is highly detectable, our attacks are stealthier. In addition, we reverse-engineer the previously unknown, improved Xor-Encrypt-Xor (XEX) based encryption mode, that AMD is using on updated processors, and show, for the first time, how it can be overcome by our new attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 26cba89e-db47-46cc-9433-07ba60d7c54fCited by top-tier papers35
- CIPHERLEAKS: Breaking Constant-time Cryptography on AMD SEV via the Ciphertext Side ChannelMengyuan Li, Yinqian Zhang, Huibo Wang, Kang Li et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 130 citations
- A Systematic Look at Ciphertext Side Channels on AMD SEV-SNPMengyuan Li, Luca Wilke, Jan Wichelmann, Thomas Eisenbarth et al.S&P 2022 · 87 citations
- Design and Verification of the Arm Confidential Compute ArchitectureXupeng Li, Xuheng Li, Christoffer Dall, Ronghui Gu et al.OSDI 2022 · 60 citations
- SoK: SGX.Fail: How Stuff Gets eXposedStephan van Schaik, Alexander Seto, Thomas Yurek, Adam Batori et al.S&P 2024 · 52 citations
- HECKLER: Breaking Confidential VMs with Malicious InterruptsBenedict Schlüter, Supraja Sridhara, Mark Kuhne, Andrin Bertschi et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 48 citations
Builds on2
- Exploiting Unprotected I/O Operations in AMD's Secure Encrypted VirtualizationMengyuan Li, Yinqian Zhang, Zhiqiang Lin, Yan SolihinUSENIX Security 2019 · 104 citations
- Insecure Until Proven Updated: Analyzing AMD SEV's Remote AttestationRobert Buhren, Christian Werling, Jean-Pierre SeifertCCS 2019 · 60 citations
Related papers
- CrossLine: Breaking "Security-by-Crash" based Memory Isolation in AMD SEVMengyuan Li, Yinqian Zhang, Zhiqiang LinCCS 2021 · 41 citations
- Reload+Reload: Exploiting Cache and Memory Contention Side Channel on AMD SEVLi-Chung Chiang, Shih-Wei LiASPLOS 2025 · 8 citations
- One Glitch to Rule Them All: Fault Injection Attacks Against AMD's Secure Encrypted VirtualizationRobert Buhren, Hans Niklas Jacob, Thilo Krachenfels, Jean-Pierre SeifertCCS 2021
- Nested SEV: Secure and Generic SEV Support for Nested VirtualizationKazuki Takiguchi, Kenichi KouraiOSDI 2026
- Heracles: Chosen Plaintext Attack on AMD SEV-SNPBenedict Schlüter, Christoph Wech, Shweta ShindeCCS 2025 · 1 citation
