Teaching Embodied Reinforcement Learning Agents: Informativeness and Diversity of Language Use
Jiajun Xi, Yinong He, Jianing Yang, Yinpei Dai, Joyce Chai
Abstract
In real-world scenarios, it is desirable for embodied agents to have the ability to leverage human language to gain explicit or implicit knowledge for learning tasks. Despite recent progress, most previous approaches adopt simple low-level instructions as language inputs, which may not reflect natural human communication. It's not clear how to incorporate rich language use to facilitate task learning. To address this question, this paper studies different types of language inputs in facilitating reinforcement learning (RL) embodied agents. More specifically, we examine how different levels of language informativeness (i.e., feedback on past behaviors and future guidance) and diversity (i.e., variation of language expressions) impact agent learning and inference. Our empirical results based on four RL benchmarks demonstrate that agents trained with diverse and informative language feedback can achieve enhanced generalization and fast adaptation to new tasks. These findings highlight the pivotal role of language use in teaching embodied agents new tasks in an open world. 1 * Equal contribution. 1 Source code available at https://github.com/ sled-group/Teachable_RL . H: You seem to be heading away from the right route. F: Make a 180-degree turn right now. 𝑎 𝑡-1 * "pedal" Expert Agent 𝜋 * prediction Agent 𝜋 in environment 𝑎 𝑡 * 𝑎 𝑡+1 * "down" "pedal" 𝑎 𝑡-1 "up" 𝑎 𝑡 "down" Time Step 𝑡 -1 𝑡 𝑡 + 1 Task: Open the bin H: You have gone to the wrong direction. F: Turn back. H: You are doing well so far. F: Pedal to open the recycling bin.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 26c8e597-daf0-424a-ab4c-9caeafee71bbCited by top-tier papers2
- BEAT: Visual Backdoor Attacks on VLM-based Embodied Agents via Contrastive Trigger LearningQiusi Zhan, Hyeonjeong Ha, Rui Yang, Sirui Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Playpen: An Environment for Exploring Learning From Dialogue Game FeedbackNicola Horst, Davide Mazzaccara, Antonia Schmidt, Michael Sullivan et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on19
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language ModelsJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2023 · 7,873 citations
- InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction TuningWenliang Dai, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,013 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
Related papers
- Learning to Model the World With LanguageJessy Lin, Yuqing Du, Olivia Watkins, Danijar Hafner et al.ICML 2024 · 76 citations
- Simple Embodied Language Learning as a Byproduct of Meta-Reinforcement LearningEvan Zheran Liu, Sahaana Suri, Tong Mu, Allan Zhou et al.ICML 2023 · 4 citations
- Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structureAndrew K. Lampinen, Nicholas A. Roy, Ishita Dasgupta, Stephanie C. Y. Chan et al.ICML 2022 · 51 citations
- Learning Compositional Tasks from Language InstructionsLajanugen Logeswaran, Wilka Carvalho, Honglak LeeAAAI 2023 · 4 citations
- GenRL: Multimodal-foundation world models for generalization in embodied agentsPietro Mazzaglia, Tim Verbelen, Bart Dhoedt, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 37 citations
