Thinking Like Transformers
Gail Weiss, Yoav Goldberg, Eran Yahav
Abstract
What is the computational model behind a Transformer? Where recurrent neural networks have direct parallels in finite state machines, allowing clear discussion and thought around architecture variants or trained models, Transformers have no such familiar parallel. In this paper we aim to change that, proposing a computational model for the transformer-encoder in the form of a programming language. We map the basic components of a transformer-encoder -- attention and feed-forward computation -- into simple primitives, around which we form a programming language: the Restricted Access Sequence Processing Language (RASP). We show how RASP can be used to program solutions to tasks that could conceivably be learned by a Transformer, and how a Transformer can be trained to mimic a RASP solution. In particular, we provide RASP programs for histograms, sorting, and Dyck-languages. We further use our model to relate their difficulty in terms of the number of required layers and attention heads: analyzing a RASP program implies a maximum number of heads and layers necessary to encode a task in a transformer. Finally, we see how insights gained from our abstraction might be used to explain phenomena seen in recent works.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers104
- What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function ClassesShivam Garg, Dimitris Tsipras, Percy Liang, Gregory ValiantNeurIPS 2022 · 883 citations
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 470 citations
- The Impact of Positional Encoding on Length Generalization in TransformersAmirhossein Kazemnejad, Inkit Padhi, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Payel Das et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 444 citations
- Transformers as Statisticians: Provable In-Context Learning with In-Context Algorithm SelectionYu Bai, Fan Chen, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 356 citations
- Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial ProblemsZhiyuan Liu, Hong Liu, Denny Zhou, Tengyu MaICLR 2024 · 259 citations
Builds on7
- Big Bird: Transformers for Longer SequencesManzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Kumar Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,159 citations
- Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?Chulhee Yun, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Ankit Singh Rawat, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICLR 2020 · 481 citations
- On the Ability and Limitations of Transformers to Recognize Formal LanguagesSatwik Bhattamishra, Kabir Ahuja, Navin GoyalEMNLP 2020 · 7 citations
- Improving Transformer Models by Reordering their SublayersOfir Press, Noah A. Smith, Omer LevyACL 2020 · 6 citations
- A Formal Hierarchy of RNN ArchitecturesWilliam Merrill, Gail Weiss, Yoav Goldberg, Roy Schwartz et al.ACL 2020 · 6 citations
Related papers
- What Algorithms can Transformers Learn? A Study in Length GeneralizationHattie Zhou, Arwen Bradley, Etai Littwin, Noam Razin et al.ICLR 2024 · 189 citations
- Discovering Interpretable Algorithms by Decompiling Transformers to RASPXinting Huang, Aleksandra Bakalova, Satwik Bhattamishra, William Merrill et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Learning Transformer ProgramsDan Friedman, Alexander Wettig, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2023 · 59 citations
- Length Generalization Bounds for TransformersAndy Yang, Pascal Bergsträßer, Georg Zetzsche, David Chiang et al.ICML 2026
- Adaptive Transformer Programs: Bridging the Gap Between Performance and Interpretability in TransformersQuoc-Vinh Lai-Dang, Taemin Kang, Seungah SonICLR 2025
