Fitting trees to ๐1-hyperbolic distances
Joon-Hyeok Yim, Anna C. Gilbert
Abstract
Building trees to represent or to fit distances is a critical component of phylogenetic analysis, metric embeddings, approximation algorithms, geometric graph neural nets, and the analysis of hierarchical data. Much of the previous algorithmic work, however, has focused on generic metric spaces (i.e., those with no a priori constraints). Leveraging several ideas from the mathematical analysis of hyperbolic geometry and geometric group theory, we study the tree fitting problem as finding the relation between the hyperbolicity (ultrametricity) vector and the error of tree (ultrametric) embedding. That is, we define a vector of hyperbolicity (ultrametric) values over all triples of points and compare the โ p norms of this vector with the โ q norm of the distortion of the best tree fit to the distances. This formulation allows us to define the average hyperbolicity (ultrametricity) in terms of a normalized โ 1 norm of the hyperbolicity vector. Furthermore, we can interpret the classical tree fitting result of Gromov as a p = q = โ result. We present an algorithm HCCROOTEDTREEFIT such that the โ 1 error of the output embedding is analytically bounded in terms of the โ 1 norm of the hyperbolicity vector (i.e., p = q = 1) and that this result is tight. Furthermore, this algorithm has significantly different theoretical and empirical performance as compared to Gromov's result and related algorithms. Finally, we show using HCCROOTEDTREEFIT and related tree fitting algorithms, that supposedly standard data sets for hierarchical data analysis and geometric graph neural networks have radically different tree fits than those of synthetic, truly tree-like data sets, suggesting that a much more refined analysis of these standard data sets is called for. 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2023).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 25f6a780-3385-4cd7-8087-4ef3980c6493Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- From Trees to Continuous Embeddings and Back: Hyperbolic Hierarchical ClusteringInes Chami, Albert Gu, Vaggos Chatziafratis, Christopher RรฉNeurIPS 2020 ยท 125 citations
- Tree! I am no Tree! I am a low dimensional Hyperbolic EmbeddingRishi Sonthalia, Anna C. GilbertNeurIPS 2020 ยท 62 citations
- Fitting Distances by Tree Metrics Minimizing the Total Error within a Constant FactorVincent Cohen-Addad, Debarati Das, Evangelos Kipouridis, Nikos Parotsidis et al.FOCS 2021 ยท 5 citations
Related papers
- HyperAid: Denoising in Hyperbolic Spaces for Tree-fitting and Hierarchical ClusteringEli Chien, Puoya Tabaghi, Olgica MilenkovicKDD 2022 ยท 1 citation
- On Efficient Low Distortion Ultrametric EmbeddingVincent Cohen-Addad, Karthik C. S., Guillaume LagardeICML 2020 ยท 13 citations
- Low-distortion and GPU-compatible Tree Embeddings in Hyperbolic SpaceMax van Spengler, Pascal MettesICML 2025
- A (1+?)-Approximation for Ultrametric Embedding in Subquadratic TimeGabriel Bathie, Guillaume LagardeAAAI 2025
- Generalization Bounds for Graph Embedding Using Negative Sampling: Linear vs HyperbolicAtsushi Suzuki, Atsushi Nitanda, Jing Wang, Linchuan Xu et al.NeurIPS 2021 ยท 16 citations
