Adapting to Context-Aware Knowledge in Natural Conversation for Multi-Turn Response Selection
Chen Zhang, Hao Wang, Feijun Jiang, Hongzhi Yin
Abstract
Virtual assistants aim to build a human-like conversational agent. However, current human-machine conversations still cannot make users feel intelligent enough to build a continued dialog over time. Some responses from agents are usually inconsistent, uninformative, less-engaging and even memoryless. In recent years, most researchers have tried to employ conversation context and external knowledge, e.g. wiki pages and knowledge graphs, into the model which only focuses on solving some special conversation problems in local perspectives. Few researchers are dedicated to the whole capability of the conversational agent which is endowed with abilities of not only passively reacting the conversation but also proactively leading the conversation. In this paper, we first explore the essence of conversations among humans by analyzing real dialog records. We find that some conversations revolve around the same context and topic, and some require additional information or even move on to a new topic. Base on that, we conclude three conversation modes shown in Figure 1 and try to solve how to adapt to them for a continuous conversation. To this end, we define “Adaptive Knowledge-Grounded Conversations” (AKGCs) where the knowledge is to ground the conversation within a multi-turn context by adapting to three modes. To achieve AKGC, a model called MNDB is proposed to model natural dialog behaviors for multi-turn response selection. To ensure a consistent response, MNDB constructs a multi-turn context flow. Then, to mimic user behaviors of incorporating knowledge in natural conversations, we design a ternary-grounding network along with the context flow. In this network, to gain the ability to adapt to diversified conversation modes, we exploit multi-view semantical relations among response candidates, context and knowledge. Thus, three adaptive matching signals are extracted for final response selection. Evaluation results on two benchmarks indicate that MNDB can significantly outperform state-of-the-art models.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 25d1ed61-82ee-40b9-b2dd-21e85ed6a451Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- DukeNet: A Dual Knowledge Interaction Network for Knowledge-Grounded ConversationChuan Meng, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Weiwei Sun et al.SIGIR 2020 · 42 citations
- History-Adaption Knowledge Incorporation Mechanism for Multi-Turn Dialogue SystemYajing Sun, Yue Hu, Luxi Xing, Jing Yu et al.AAAI 2020 · 18 citations
- There Is No Standard Answer: Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation with Adversarial Activated Multi-Reference LearningXueliang Zhao, Tingchen Fu, Chongyang Tao, Rui YanEMNLP 2022 · 2 citations
- There Are a Thousand Hamlets in a Thousand People's Eyes: Enhancing Knowledge-grounded Dialogue with Personal MemoryTingchen Fu, Xueliang Zhao, Chongyang Tao, Ji-Rong Wen et al.ACL 2022
- A Pre-training Strategy for Zero-Resource Response Selection in Knowledge-Grounded ConversationsChongyang Tao, Changyu Chen, Jiazhan Feng, Ji-Rong Wen et al.ACL 2021
