Cryptanalysis of Full LowMC and LowMC-M with Algebraic Techniques
Fukang Liu, Takanori Isobe, Willi Meier
Abstract
In this paper, we revisit the difference enumeration technique for LowMC and develop new algebraic techniques to achieve efficient key-recovery attacks. In the original difference enumeration attack framework, an inevitable step is to precompute and store a set of intermediate state differences for efficient checking via the binary search. Our first observation is that Bar-On et al.'s general algebraic technique developed for SPNs with partial nonlinear layers can be utilized to fulfill the same task, which can make the memory complexity negligible as there is no need to store a huge set of state differences any more. Benefiting from this technique, we could significantly improve the attacks on LowMC when the block size is much larger than the key size and even break LowMC with such a kind of parameter. On the other hand, with our new key-recovery technique, we could significantly improve the time to retrieve the full key if given only a single pair of input and output messages together with the difference trail that they take, which was stated as an interesting question by Rechberger et al. at ToSC 2018. Combining both techniques, with only 2 chosen plaintexts, we could break 4 rounds of LowMC adopting a full S-Box layer with block size of 129, 192 and 255 bits, respectively, which are the 3 recommended parameters for Picnic3, an alternative third-round candidate in NIST's Post-Quantum Cryptography competition. We have to emphasize that our attacks do not indicate that Picnic3 is broken as the Picnic use-case is very different and an attacker cannot even freely choose 2 plaintexts to encrypt for a concrete LowMC instance. However, such parameters are deemed as secure in the latest LowMC. Moreover, much more rounds of seven instances of the backdoor cipher LowMC-M as proposed by Peyrin and Wang in CRYPTO 2020 can be broken without finding the backdoor by making full use of the allowed data. The above mentioned attacks are all achieved with negligible memory.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Coefficient Grouping for Complex Affine LayersFukang Liu, Lorenzo Grassi, Clémence Bouvier, Willi Meier et al.CRYPTO 2023 · 10 citations
- ORQ: Complex Analytics on Private Data with Strong Security GuaranteesEli Baum, Sam Buxbaum, Nitin Mathai, Muhammad Faisal et al.SOSP 2025 · 4 citations
- GORAM: Graph-oriented ORAM for Efficient Ego-centric Queries on Federated GraphsXiaoyu Fan, Kun Chen, Jiping Yu, Xiaowei Zhu et al.VLDB 2025 · 3 citations
- GigaDORAM: Breaking the Billion Address BarrierBrett Hemenway Falk, Rafail Ostrovsky, Matan Shtepel, Jacob ZhangUSENIX Security 2023
- Linear Private Set Union from Multi-Query Reverse Private Membership TestCong Zhang, Yu Chen, Weiran Liu, Min Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2023
Related papers
- Implementing Grover Oracles for Quantum Key Search on AES and LowMCSamuel Jaques, Michael Naehrig, Martin Roetteler, Fernando VirdiaEUROCRYPT 2020 · 226 citations
- On a Generalization of Substitution-Permutation Networks: The HADES Design StrategyLorenzo Grassi, Reinhard Lüftenegger, Christian Rechberger, Dragos Rotaru et al.EUROCRYPT 2020 · 77 citations
- A Generic Algorithm for Efficient Key Recovery in Differential Attacks - and its Associated ToolChristina Boura, Nicolas David, Patrick Derbez, Rachelle Heim Boissier et al.EUROCRYPT 2024 · 11 citations
- Cryptanalytic Applications of the Polynomial Method for Solving Multivariate Equation Systems over GF(2)Itai DinurEUROCRYPT 2021 · 58 citations
- Triangulating Meet-in-the-Middle AttackBoxin Zhao, Qingliang Hou, Lingyue Qin, Xiaoyang DongCRYPTO 2025 · 1 citation
