Normalization-equivariant Diffusion Models: Learning Posterior Samplers From Noisy And Partial Measurements
Brett Levac, Jon Tamir, Marcelo Pereyra, Julián Tachella
Abstract
Diffusion models (DMs) have rapidly emerged as a powerful framework for image generation and restoration, achieving remarkable perceptual quality. However, existing DMs are primarily trained in a supervised manner by using a large corpus of clean images. This reliance on clean data poses fundamental challenges in many real-world scenarios, where acquiring noise-free data is hard or infeasible, and only noisy and potentially incomplete measurements are available. While some methods are capable of training DMs using noisy data, they are generally effective only when the amount of noise is very mild or when some additional noise-free data is available. In addition, existing methods for training DMs from incomplete measurements require access to multiple complementary acquisition processes, an assumption that poses a significant practical limitation. Here we introduce the first approach for learning DMs for image restoration using only noisy measurement data from a single operator. As a first key contribution, we show that DMs, and more broadly minimum mean squared error denoisers, exhibit a weak form of scale equivariance linking rescaling in signal amplitude to changes in noise intensity. We then leverage this theoretical insight to develop a denoising score-matching strategy that generalizes robustly to noise levels lower than those present in the training data, thereby enabling the learning of DMs from noisy measurements. To further address the challenges of incomplete and noisy data, we integrate our method with equivariant imaging, a complementary self-supervised learning framework that exploits the inherent invariants of imaging problems, in order to train DMs for image restoration from single-operator measurements that are both incomplete and noisy. We validate the effectiveness of our approach through extensive experiments on image denoising, demosaicing, and inpainting, along with comparisons with the state of the art.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2563bf50-1d9a-4930-a014-b8d1d6782c2cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative ModelsTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, Samuli LaineNeurIPS 2022 · 3,959 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Restoration ModelsBahjat Kawar, Michael Elad, Stefano Ermon, Jiaming SongNeurIPS 2022 · 1,439 citations
- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential EquationsYang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,270 citations
- Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative PriorsAjil Jalal, Marius Arvinte, Giannis Daras, Eric Price et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 483 citations
Related papers
- An Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for Training Clean Diffusion Models from Corrupted ObservationsWeimin Bai, Yifei Wang, Wenzheng Chen, He SunNeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- A Diffusion Model with State Estimation for Degradation-Blind Inverse ImagingLiya Ji, Zhefan Rao, Sinno Jialin Pan, Chenyang Lei et al.AAAI 2024 · 5 citations
- Measurement Score-Based Diffusion ModelChicago Y. Park, Shirin Shoushtari, Hongyu An, Ulugbek KamilovICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Pseudoinverse-Guided Diffusion Models for Inverse ProblemsJiaming Song, Arash Vahdat, Morteza Mardani, Jan KautzICLR 2023
- Stochastic Deep Restoration Priors for Imaging Inverse ProblemsYuyang Hu, Albert Peng, Weijie Gan, Peyman Milanfar et al.ICML 2025
