Lune

ICLR2025Top-tier venue

MetaMetrics: Calibrating Metrics for Generation Tasks Using Human Preferences

Genta Indra Winata, David Anugraha, Lucky Susanto, Garry Kuwanto, Derry Tanti Wijaya

2025Year
3Top-tier citations

Abstract

Understanding the quality of a performance evaluation metric is crucial for ensuring that model outputs align with human preferences. However, it remains unclear how well each metric captures the diverse aspects of these preferences, as metrics often excel in one particular area but not across all dimensions. To address this, it is essential to systematically calibrate metrics to specific aspects of human preference, catering to the unique characteristics of each aspect. We introduce METAMETRICS, a calibrated meta-metric designed to evaluate generation tasks across different modalities in a supervised manner. METAMETRICS optimizes the combination of existing metrics to enhance their alignment with human preferences. Our metric demonstrates flexibility and effectiveness in both language and vision downstream tasks, showing significant benefits across various multilingual and multi-domain scenarios. METAMETRICS aligns closely with human preferences and is highly extendable and easily integrable into any application. This makes METAMETRICS a powerful tool for improving the evaluation of generation tasks, ensuring that metrics are more representative of human judgment across diverse contexts. * The work was done outside Capital One. † Equal contribution.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers3

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on10

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines