NAISR: A 3D Neural Additive Model for Interpretable Shape Representation
Yining Jiao, Carlton J. Zdanski, Julia S. Kimbell, Andrew Prince, Cameron Worden, Samuel Kirse, Christopher Rutter, Benjamin Shields, William Dunn, Jisan Mahmud, Marc Niethammer
Abstract
Deep implicit functions (DIFs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for many computer vision tasks such as 3D shape reconstruction, generation, registration, completion, editing, and understanding. However, given a set of 3D shapes with associated covariates there is at present no shape representation method which allows to precisely represent the shapes while capturing the individual dependencies on each covariate. Such a method would be of high utility to researchers to discover knowledge hidden in a population of shapes. For scientific shape discovery, we propose a 3D Neural Additive Model for Interpretable Shape Representation () which describes individual shapes by deforming a shape atlas in accordance to the effect of disentangled covariates. Our approach captures shape population trends and allows for patient-specific predictions through shape transfer. is the first approach to combine the benefits of deep implicit shape representations with an atlas deforming according to specified covariates. We evaluate with respect to shape reconstruction, shape disentanglement, shape evolution, and shape transfer on three datasets: 1) , a simulated 2D shape dataset; 2) the ADNI hippocampus 3D shape dataset; and 3) a pediatric airway 3D shape dataset. Our experiments demonstrate that achieves excellent shape reconstruction performance while retaining interpretability. Our code is available at .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 24fe52bb-7c41-4a40-a11e-a810f0f3d194Cited by top-tier papers3
- Additive Models Explained: A Computational Complexity ApproachShahaf Bassan, Michal Moshkovitz, Guy KatzNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Provably Explaining Neural Additive ModelsShahaf Bassan, Yizhak Yisrael Elboher, Tobias Ladner, Volkan Şahin et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- :A 3D Probabilistic Neural Representation for Interpretable Shape ModelingYining Jiao, Shankar Bhamidi, Carlton ZDANSKI, Julia Kimbell et al.ICML 2026
Builds on38
- Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation FunctionsVincent Sitzmann, Julien N. P. Martel, Alexander W. Bergman, David B. Lindell et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,008 citations
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
- Nerfies: Deformable Neural Radiance FieldsKeunhong Park, Utkarsh Sinha, Jonathan T. Barron, Sofien Bouaziz et al.ICCV 2021 · 1,442 citations
- Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning ShapesAmos Gropp, Lior Yariv, Niv Haim, Matan Atzmon et al.ICML 2020 · 1,001 citations
- Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural NetsRishabh Agarwal, Levi Melnick, Nicholas Frosst, Xuezhou Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 663 citations
Related papers
- Deep Implicit Templates for 3D Shape RepresentationZerong Zheng, Tao Yu, Qionghai Dai, Yebin LiuCVPR 2021
- ImplicitAtlas: Learning Deformable Shape Templates in Medical ImagingJiancheng Yang, Udaranga Wickramasinghe, Bingbing Ni, Pascal FuaCVPR 2022 · 34 citations
- Neural Feature Matching in Implicit 3D RepresentationsYunlu Chen, Basura Fernando, Hakan Bilen, Thomas Mensink et al.ICML 2021 · 8 citations
- NPMs: Neural Parametric Models for 3D Deformable ShapesPablo R. Palafox, Aljaz Bozic, Justus Thies, Matthias Nießner et al.ICCV 2021 · 129 citations
- Differentiable Design Galleries: A Differentiable Approach to Explore the Design Space of Transfer FunctionsBo Pan, Jiaying Lu, Haoxuan Li, Weifeng Chen et al.IEEE VIS 2023 · 11 citations
