Optimal Sampling Gaps for Adaptive Submodular Maximization
Shaojie Tang, Jing Yuan
Abstract
Running machine learning algorithms on large and rapidly growing volumes of data is often computationally expensive, one common trick to reduce the size of a data set, and thus reduce the computational cost of machine learning algorithms, is probability sampling. It creates a sampled data set by including each data point from the original data set with a known probability. Although the benefit of running machine learning algorithms on the reduced data set is obvious, one major concern is that the performance of the solution obtained from samples might be much worse than that of the optimal solution when using the full data set. In this paper, we examine the performance loss caused by probability sampling in the context of adaptive submodular maximization. We consider a simple probability sampling method which selects each data point with probability at least r ∈ [0, 1]. If we set r = 1, our problem reduces to finding a solution based on the original full data set. We define sampling gap as the largest ratio between the optimal solution obtained from the full data set and the optimal solution obtained from the samples, over independence systems. Our main contribution is to show that if the sampling probability of each data point is at least r and the utility function is policywise submodular, then the sampling gap is both upper bounded and lower bounded by 1/r. We show that the property of policywise submodular can be found in a wide range of real-world applications, including pool-based active learning and adaptive viral marketing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Related papers
- Unconstrained Submodular Maximization with Modular Costs: Tight Approximation and Application to Profit MaximizationTianyuan Jin, Yu Yang, Renchi Yang, Jieming Shi et al.VLDB 2021 · 31 citations
- Fast Adaptive Non-Monotone Submodular Maximization Subject to a Knapsack ConstraintGeorgios Amanatidis, Federico Fusco, Philip Lazos, Stefano Leonardi et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 59 citations
- Randomized Algorithms for Submodular Function Maximization with a k-System ConstraintShuang Cui, Kai Han, Tianshuai Zhu, Jing Tang et al.ICML 2021 · 17 citations
- Scale-invariant Optimal Sampling for Rare-events Data and Sparse ModelsJing Wang, HaiYing Wang, Hao ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- Adaptive Greedy versus Non-Adaptive Greedy for Influence MaximizationWei Chen, Binghui Peng, Grant Schoenebeck, Biaoshuai TaoAAAI 2020 · 27 citations
